IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue2pp329-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and political determinants of central fiscal transfers in India: A dynamic panel analysis of state level data

Author

Listed:
  • Prasant Kumar Panda

    (Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India)

Abstract

This article empirically examines economic and political determinants of the aggregated as well as the channel-specific Central transfers to states in a developing country like India. An annual panel data set for 22 Indian States for the period of 1980-81 to 2010-11 is used for this purpose. Considering non-availability of continuous data for the study period, States like Arunachal Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Goa, Jharkhand, Mizoram and Uttaranchal are not considered in the study. Dynamic panel regression equations are specified to analyze the determinants of Central transfers. Various components of Central transfers are alternatively regressed on a set of economic-demographic and political variables like per-capita gross state domestic product, population, literacy rate, area, fiscal dependency, loyal voter, State election year dummy, political alignment and bargaining power. State-specific dummies are included in all models to control for the unobserved time-invariant State specific effects. Linear time trend (year) is also included in all equations, as some of time series variables used are found to be trend stationary. System generalized methods of moments (GMM) estimator with heteroskedastic corrected robust standard error is used to obtain coefficients. Post-estimation tests like the Sargan test for over-identifying restrictions and Arellano Bond autocorrelation tests at first differenced error are used for verifying the validity of model. The results suggest that all categories of Central transfers are affected by political factors, besides economic-demographic variables. The states having partisan alignment with the Centre and greater political bargaining power tend to receive larger per capita central transfers. While loyal voter variable has significant and positive effect on per capita discretionary grant, state election year dummy never emerges to be statistically significant. This indicates that the transfers in Indian case are mainly targeted to core voters than to create swing. Among the economic variables, potential influence arises from the fiscal requirement and level of service provisions in the state. Findings of the study are observed to be robust and immune to change of specifications from linear to log-linear and omission of special category states from the data set. Recommending formula-based transfers, bringing all components of transfers into formula net, objective assessment of non-plan revenue deficit grant and co-ordination among resource recommending agencies in designing weights and criteria would help to check political influence.

Suggested Citation

  • Prasant Kumar Panda, 2016. "Economic and political determinants of central fiscal transfers in India: A dynamic panel analysis of state level data," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(2), pages 329-347, April-Jun.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue2:pp:329-347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/621349
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anubhab Pattanayak & K. S. Kavi Kumar, 2022. "Fiscal Transfers, Natural Calamities and Partisan Politics: Evidence from India," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 375-392, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Federal transfers; Determinants of grants; Political determinants of central transfers; Political economy of federal transfers; Dynamic panel analysis; GMM estimation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue2:pp:329-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.