Author
Abstract
A standard behavior can only be established along with a justified maintenance of mental health through group formation. Group formation in an organization and its cohesiveness place what impact on the group and the organization. This research throws the light on the working of the group. Here, in the study, the author seeps to investigate- (i) group cohesiveness as a factor of member morale, (ii) group formation can lead to less stress regarding work-related matters and (iii) group cohesiveness increases performance. The study was conducted in a manufacturing unit in Ghaziabad. This factory has a typical organizational structure with a supervisory hierarchy of workshops. Each workshop is made up of a group of skilled employees, who have in common a single supervisor and a work assignment in which individual taska are either similar or complementary. In this factory the work sections typically have about 10 to 15 members, but they may number over 75. Such a work section is the basic unit of formal Organization stricture. We come to a conception of group cohesiveness as a facilitating factor which determines the amount of Influence a group has but not necessarily the direction or the goal towards which the group influences operate. We see the variable, group cohesiveness, as being of sufficient importance to make its effects measurable. They are measurable even in a complex setting in which the formal social structure is designed to ignore or even suppress group effects and in which there are strong factors, such as in-dividual mobility, multiply group membership, out-plant associations, problems of reliable measurement and others, which tend to obscure primary group effects.
Suggested Citation
Dr. Sandeep Singhal, 2019.
"Group Cohesiveness Through Industrial Morale and Productivity,"
Journal of Commerce and Trade, Society for Advanced Management Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 78-83, Octobor.
Handle:
RePEc:jct:journl:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:78-83
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
- G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jct:journl:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:78-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Himanshu Agarwal (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.