IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jcq/ijsrce/v6y2022i2id488.html

Analysis of Rubberized Concrete Deck Slab for Different Bridge Structures as Per IRC Loadings

Author

Listed:
  • Ankit Patel
  • Murlidhar Chourasiya

Abstract

In this research work the finite element method is used for the analysis of three different type of bridges i.e. cable stayed, cable suspension and deck bridge with rubberized and NaOH treated rubberized concrete of constant width and length is considered.In this study analyze different bridge sections for same loading conditions and sections. The loading class considered is CLASS 70R from IRC 006-2014. A Finite Element model is formulated for this study using Staad beava software package. This model is then analyzed, for parameters like deflection, stress under the influence of moving vehicle load also to discuss the cost effectiveness of each type of bridge.The basis aim for this study is to give the best output for implementation of these results in future working conditions. In this study it is concluded that cable suspension bridge is comparatively more stable whereas cable stayed bridge is economical of all the types of bridge considered and deck bridge shows worst results overall.

Suggested Citation

  • Ankit Patel & Murlidhar Chourasiya, 2022. "Analysis of Rubberized Concrete Deck Slab for Different Bridge Structures as Per IRC Loadings," Int J Sci Res Civil Engg, International Journal of Scientific Research in Civil Engineering, vol. 6(2), pages 113-121, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:jcq:ijsrce:v6:y2022:i2:id:488
    DOI: 10.32628/IJSRCE22629
    Note: Article URL: https://ijsrce.com/home/article/view/IJSRCE22629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsrce.com/home/article/view/IJSRCE22629
    File Function: Article URL
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijsrce.com/home/article/download/IJSRCE22629/IJSRCE22629
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32628/IJSRCE22629?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jcq:ijsrce:v6:y2022:i2:id:488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrce.com/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.