IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jbi/ijsrhs/v2y2025i4id136.html

Hybrid AI Models for Real-Time Decision-Making in Dynamic Business Environments: A Comparative Study of XGBoost, LSTM, and Reinforcement Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Iboro Akpan Essien
  • Geraldine Chika Nwokocha
  • Eseoghene Daniel
  • igha
  • Ehimah Obuse
  • Ayorinde Olayiwola Akindemowo

Abstract

This explores the application of hybrid artificial intelligence (AI) models for real-time decision-making in dynamic business environments, focusing on a comparative analysis of three prominent techniques: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Reinforcement Learning (RL). Rapid technological advancements and increasing market volatility have intensified the need for advanced decision-support systems that can adapt to evolving business conditions. Traditional models often fail to capture the complex, non-linear, and temporal dynamics of modern business operations, necessitating more sophisticated AI-driven solutions. The research highlights the distinct capabilities and limitations of each model. XGBoost, a powerful ensemble learning method, excels in structured data analysis and predictive accuracy, offering robust performance in tasks such as credit scoring, sales forecasting, and fraud detection. However, its static nature limits adaptability in rapidly changing environments. LSTM networks, a class of recurrent neural networks, are designed for sequence prediction and effectively capture temporal dependencies, making them well-suited for applications such as demand forecasting, financial market prediction, and supply chain optimization. Nevertheless, LSTM models require substantial data and computational resources, and they can suffer from overfitting if not carefully tuned. Reinforcement Learning offers a fundamentally different approach, enabling adaptive learning through interaction with the environment. RL models are effective for optimizing dynamic decision processes, such as inventory management, dynamic pricing, and autonomous financial trading. However, their complexity, training instability, and requirement for extensive exploration pose significant challenges for practical deployment. This concludes that no single model universally outperforms others across all applications. Instead, hybrid approaches that integrate XGBoost, LSTM, and RL can leverage the strengths of each technique to enhance predictive accuracy, adaptability, and real-time responsiveness. This advocates for further research into hybrid AI frameworks, emphasizing the need for explainability, scalability, and ethical considerations in business-critical decision-making systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Iboro Akpan Essien & Geraldine Chika Nwokocha & Eseoghene Daniel & igha & Ehimah Obuse & Ayorinde Olayiwola Akindemowo, 2025. "Hybrid AI Models for Real-Time Decision-Making in Dynamic Business Environments: A Comparative Study of XGBoost, LSTM, and Reinforcement Learning," International Journal of Scientific Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, International Journal of Scientific Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 2(4), pages 156-174, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:jbi:ijsrhs:v2:y2025:i4:id:136
    Note: Article URL: https://ijsrhss.com/home/article/view/IJSRHSS25288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsrhss.com/home/article/view/IJSRHSS25288
    File Function: Article URL
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijsrhss.com/home/article/download/IJSRHSS25288/IJSRHSS25288
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbi:ijsrhs:v2:y2025:i4:id:136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrhss.com/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.