Author
Abstract
In the changing dynamics of workplace diversity, there is a growing movement from just representation to creating real inclusion, particularly for people with disabilities. The study examines the extent of awareness and use of sign language and assistive technologies in Mumbai-based organizations and how they affect employee productivity and job satisfaction. The study employs a mixed-method design, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data to provide an in-depth understanding of inclusive communication practices. A stratified purposive sampling design was employed to reflect a range of diverse perspectives by organizational types and disability categories. Statistical methods including Pearson correlation and regression were applied to analyze data through SPSS 26. Results confirm a strong positive correlation between the organizational type and the utilization of inclusive tools, which implies that structural and cultural influences within the organization affect the level of accessibility. Moreover, inclusive communication practices were found to significantly and statistically impact employee productivity as well as job satisfaction. These findings emphasize the strategic value of transcending performative diversity initiatives in embracing practical, inclusive interventions that facilitate participation by everyone. The research points to the indispensable role of leadership and organizational engagement in fostering inclusion and provides insights into how these practices can translate into better workplace outcomes. Although the study has some rich contributions, its geographic limitation and use of self-reported data necessitate subsequent studies in more diverse and large contexts.
Suggested Citation
Souumya Kothari, 2025.
"Engineering Inclusion in Indian Workplaces: A Mumbai-Based Study on Sign Language and Assistive Tech Integration,"
International Journal of Scientific Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, International Journal of Scientific Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 2(4), pages 41-49, July.
Handle:
RePEc:jbi:ijsrhs:v2:y2025:i4:id:110
Note: Article URL: https://ijsrhss.com/home/article/view/IJSRHSS25249
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbi:ijsrhs:v2:y2025:i4:id:110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrhss.com/home .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.