Author
Listed:
- Olasehinde Omolayo
- Oluwatobi Akinboboye
- David Frempong
- Andikan Udofot Umana
- Muritala Omeiza Umar
Abstract
Defect detection in Agile software development environments is critical to maintaining high-quality deliverables and ensuring continuous improvement. This paper examines defect detection strategies that leverage automation and collaborative workflows within Agile teams to enhance software quality and delivery speed. It investigates how Quality Assurance (QA) practices integrated with Agile principles such as continuous integration (CI), test-driven development (TDD), and daily stand-ups create a proactive environment for identifying and resolving defects early in the development lifecycle. The study highlights the role of automated testing tools, including Selenium, JUnit, and Cypress, in executing rapid and repeatable test cycles. These tools support test automation frameworks that align with Agile sprints, enabling immediate feedback on code changes and reducing the risk of regression. Through behavior-driven development (BDD) and unit testing, defects are identified at both functional and code levels. The integration of QA professionals into Agile teams facilitates continuous collaboration between developers, testers, and product owners, promoting shared responsibility and fast defect triage. Collaborative defect management workflows such as pairing sessions, peer reviews, and sprint retrospectives foster knowledge sharing and collective accountability. The paper also examines defect tracking systems like Jira and Azure DevOps, which enable real-time issue tracking, transparent backlog management, and seamless communication across teams. Case studies from software development firms illustrate how Agile-aligned QA approaches improve defect detection rates, shorten resolution times, and boost overall software quality. Challenges in implementing automated QA strategies such as flaky tests, tool integration, and team skill gaps are also addressed, with mitigation strategies based on empirical evidence. Findings indicate that combining automation with Agile collaboration significantly strengthens defect resolution workflows and elevates product reliability. This research supports the adoption of integrated QA practices as a best-in-class approach to achieving continuous quality improvement in Agile software development.
Suggested Citation
Olasehinde Omolayo & Oluwatobi Akinboboye & David Frempong & Andikan Udofot Umana & Muritala Omeiza Umar, 2023.
"Defect Detection Strategies in Agile Teams: Improving Software Quality through Automation and Collaborative Workflows,"
International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 9(5), pages 519-555, October.
Handle:
RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v9:y2023:i5:id:hcseit239080
Note: Article URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/CSEIT239080
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v9:y2023:i5:id:hcseit239080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (USA) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrcseit.com/home .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.