IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jbh/ijsrcs/v3y2018i6idhcseit183611.html

Analysis the Strength of Agile Methodologies in Software Development

Author

Listed:
  • K M. Jyoti
  • Tinku Singh
  • Parul Saharavat

Abstract

There are several software development methodologies in use today. Some companies have their own customized methodology for developing their software but the majority speaks about two kinds of methodologies: heavyweight and lightweight. The strengths and weakness between the two opposing methodologies are discussed and the challenges associated with implementing agile processes in the software industry are provided. According to our findings agile methodologies can provide good benefits for small scaled and medium scaled projects but for large scaled projects traditional methods seem dominant. The study also focuses the different success factors of agile methods, the success rate of agile projects and comparison between traditional and agile software development.

Suggested Citation

  • K M. Jyoti & Tinku Singh & Parul Saharavat, 2018. "Analysis the Strength of Agile Methodologies in Software Development," International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 3(6), pages 32-37, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v3:y2018:i6:id:hcseit183611
    Note: Article URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/CSEIT183611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/CSEIT183611
    File Function: Article URL
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/paper/CSEIT183611.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v3:y2018:i6:id:hcseit183611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (USA) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrcseit.com/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.