IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jbh/ijsrcs/v2y2017i6idhcseit172612.html

Comparative Analysis of Classification Methods in R Environment with two Different Data Sets

Author

Listed:
  • B Nithya
  • V Ilango

Abstract

Machine Learning methods are widely used in various domains as they are influential in classification and prediction processes. The frequently used supervised machine learning task is classification. There are various types of classification algorithms with strengths and weaknesses appropriate for different types of input data. This paper depicts the implementation of few classification methods such as Decision Tree, K Nearest Neighbour and Naïve Byes classifier for different datasets in R environment. This paper presents the comparative study of these methods using open source tool R. The aim of this paper is to analyse the performance of these methods in two different datasets based on the evaluation metrics like accuracy and error rate. The implementation procedure show that the performance of any classification algorithm is based on the type of attributes of datasets and their characteristics. This paper shows that based on the constraints, requirements with type of input datasets specific algorithm and tool can be chosen for implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • B Nithya & V Ilango, 2017. "Comparative Analysis of Classification Methods in R Environment with two Different Data Sets," International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 2(6), pages 136-141, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v2:y2017:i6:id:hcseit172612
    Note: Article URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/CSEIT172612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/CSEIT172612
    File Function: Article URL
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/paper/CSEIT172612.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v2:y2017:i6:id:hcseit172612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (USA) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrcseit.com/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.