Author
Abstract
Wireless Sensor Networks are prone to attacks as nodes can easily get compromised. Traditional authentication protocols only authenticate the node at the time of entry which allows the node to continue acting however it pleases afterward. To address this issue, we present ZeroTrust-WSN: a novel continuous authentication & behavioural risk verification model for Wireless Sensor Networks that allows us to identify malicious sensor nodes with the same low overhead of authentication. Our model consists of lightweight authentication, behavioural checks at intervals, trust calculation, risk scoring, and reactions such as limiting access, re-authentication, rekeying and quarantine. Behaviours analysed include packet forwarding rates, legitimacy of neighbouring nodes during communication, idle listening, energy left, past trust, and proof of deviations. We implemented our model using Python and NS-3 and compared it to three baseline models: Blockchain_ SecAuth, Lightweight Decision Tree IDS and THN-NBA-MND. Results show that ZeroTrust-WSN had an authentication accuracy of 96.8% with 96.2% success rate at detecting compromised nodes with a false positive rate of 3.1% and an average verification delay of 14.6 ms while retaining 95.4% of the network's energy- efficiency when under attack. On all security categories, our model stayed within ~94%-97% and outperformed all baseline models by continuously verifying nodes rather than assigning static trust values. This shows our model's ability to be used as an effective security solution for WSNs as it provides continuous, adaptive, low-overhead security that doesn't tax the limited computations of sensor nodes.
Suggested Citation
Remya K & Joshna M, 2026.
"Continuous Lightweight Authentication and Behavioural Risk Verification for Compromised Sensor Node Detection,"
International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 12(4), pages 268-281, July.
Handle:
RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v12:y2026:i4:id:2136
DOI: 10.32628/CSEIT26124229
Note: Article URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/view/CSEIT26124229
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v12:y2026:i4:id:2136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (USA) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrcseit.com/home .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.