Author
Abstract
Security Operations Centers (SOCs) face an acute alert fatigue crisis, with analysts processing thousands of alerts daily while over 80% prove to be false positives. Existing automated triage solutions rely on static rule based playbooks or pretrained classifiers that require extensive labeled training data and fail to generalize across diverse alert types. This paper presents an autonomous alert triage framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) with agentic tool augmented reasoning to investigate and classify security alerts without prior training data. Our approach introduces four key contributions: (1) a multi source data correlation pipeline that dynamically queries endpoint detection, threat intelligence, and incident management systems through a standardized tool integration protocol, enabling the LLM to perform real time evidence gathering; (2) a knowledge accumulation mechanism that builds institutional memory from past triage outcomes, improving classification accuracy over time without model retraining; (3) a layered prompt injection defense architecture that safely processes untrusted alert content within the LLM reasoning chain; and (4) a structured verdict extraction method that produces machine parseable triage outputs for downstream SOC workflow integration. We evaluate our framework on a production SOC environment processing 847 real world alerts spanning cloud identity threats, endpoint detections, and web application attacks over a 30 day period. Results demonstrate a mean triage time of 28 seconds (compared to 15 to 45 minutes for manual triage), 94.1% agreement with senior analyst verdicts (κ = 0.93), a weighted F1 score of 95.4% for severity classification, and 98% prompt injection resilience across adversarial test cases. The framework operates as a generalizable, vendor agnostic pipeline where the investigation strategy adapts dynamically based on alert content.
Suggested Citation
Sunil Kumar & Irfan Khan, 2026.
"Autonomous Security Alert Triage Using LLM Based Agentic Investigation with Tool Augmented Reasoning,"
International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 12(2), pages 752-765, April.
Handle:
RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v12:y2026:i2:id:1978
DOI: 10.32628/CSEIT261213109
Note: Article URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/view/CSEIT261213109
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v12:y2026:i2:id:1978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (USA) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrcseit.com/home .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.