IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jbh/ijsrcs/v12y2026i1id1867.html

A Comparative Study of the Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm for Software Evolution Process

Author

Listed:
  • Rajeeb Sankar Bal
  • Jibendu Kumar Mantri

Abstract

The software industry increasingly emphasizes the improvement of software quality. Modern development practices recognize that software should be built and maintained through a well-defined, structured process, consisting of organized and systematic steps for designing, developing, and evolving software systems. Petri net is applied for basic block of the software process. Path-based testing supports the software process by systematically identifying key execution paths to improve test planning and coverage. Using optimization techniques like Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) helps efficiently generate test paths, enhancing the quality and effectiveness of process-level testing activities. Search-based optimization techniques improve decision making in the software process by transforming tasks such as cost estimation, release planning, and test generation into optimization problems. These methods efficiently explore large solution spaces to find near optimal solutions. Genetic algorithm (GA) is particularly effective due to their scalability and ability to handle multiple objectives, enhancing process efficiency, resource allocation, and software quality. In this paper, we present the development of a workflow software process modeled using Petri Nets. The approach helps in analyzing, controlling, and improving process execution within software development. We have proposed path testing technique applies PSO and GA to efficiently generate test paths that satisfy the all-uses criterion, improving planning and coverage in the software process. Comparative results show that PSO can achieve complete def–use path coverage with fewer generations than GA, enhancing testing efficiency and process effectiveness. The software industry increasingly emphasizes the improvement of software quality. Modern development practices recognize that software should be built and maintained through a well-defined, structured process, consisting of organized and systematic steps for designing, developing, and evolving software systems. Petri net is applied for basic block of the software process. Path-based testing supports the software process by systematically identifying key execution paths to improve test planning and coverage. Using optimization techniques like Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) helps efficiently generate test paths, enhancing the quality and effectiveness of process-level testing activities. Search-based optimization techniques improve decision making in the software process by transforming tasks such as cost estimation, release planning, and test generation into optimization problems. These methods efficiently explore large solution spaces to find near optimal solutions. Genetic algorithm (GA) is particularly effective due to their scalability and ability to handle multiple objectives, enhancing process efficiency, resource allocation, and software quality. In this paper, we present the development of a workflow software process modeled using Petri Nets. The approach helps in analyzing, controlling, and improving process execution within software development. We have proposed path testing technique applies PSO and GA to efficiently generate test paths that satisfy the all-uses criterion, improving planning and coverage in the software process. Comparative results show that PSO can achieve complete def–use path coverage with fewer generations than GA, enhancing testing efficiency and process effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajeeb Sankar Bal & Jibendu Kumar Mantri, 2026. "A Comparative Study of the Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm for Software Evolution Process," International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 12(1), pages 273-285, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v12:y2026:i1:id:1867
    DOI: 10.32628/CSEIT2612131
    Note: Article URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/view/CSEIT2612131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/view/CSEIT2612131
    File Function: Article URL
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/download/CSEIT2612131/CSEIT2612131
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32628/CSEIT2612131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v12:y2026:i1:id:1867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrcseit.com/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.