IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jbh/ijsrcs/v11y2025i6id1780.html

A Comparative Analysis of CNN, XG Boost, DNN and Res Net for Leukemia Classification Using Hybrid PSO Model

Author

Listed:
  • Lila Misra
  • Rahul Shrivastava

Abstract

Major health concern is leukemia, a form of blood cancer marked by aberrant white blood cell development. Effective treatment depends on an early and precise diagnosis, and deep learning (DL) has become a game-changing tool in this field. A thorough examination of several deep learning models, such as ResNet, XG Boost, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), is given in this review study. For prompt treatment, leukemia must be identified from peripheral blood smear images as soon as possible. Although medical image analysis is dominated by Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), recent research has investigated ensemble and gradient boosted techniques as XG Boost, Deeper ResNet, and fully connected DNNs. Four typical models—custom CNN, ResNet 50, feature fusion with XG Boost, and a multilayer DNN—are experimentally compared head-to-head on the public ALL IDB1, ALL IDB2, and C NMC 2019 datasets in this study. ResNet 50 had the highest macro F1 (96.8%), followed by CNN (94.3%), DNN (90.1%), and XG Boost (88.5%). The significance of ResNet's margin (p

Suggested Citation

  • Lila Misra & Rahul Shrivastava, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of CNN, XG Boost, DNN and Res Net for Leukemia Classification Using Hybrid PSO Model," International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 11(6), pages 193-200, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v11:y2025:i6:id:1780
    DOI: 10.32628/CSEIT2511630
    Note: Article URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/view/CSEIT2511630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/view/CSEIT2511630
    File Function: Article URL
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/download/CSEIT2511630/CSEIT2511630
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32628/CSEIT2511630?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v11:y2025:i6:id:1780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (USA) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrcseit.com/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.