Author
Abstract
Insurance fraud creates substantial economic and operational pressure on the United States insurance system, while digital claims processing increases the need for fast, evidence-based screening. This study develops and evaluates FraudLens AI, a hybrid claims-forensics framework that combines supervised fraud probability, unsupervised anomaly signals, behavioral indicators, provider risk, document and narrative inconsistency, and relational-network information. The analysis uses the aggregate research dataset supplied for this study: 15,000 claims distributed across automobile/motor (40%), health/medical (30%), property/homeowners (20%), and workers' compensation (10%). The supplied class distribution contains 13,500 legitimate claims and 1,500 fraudulent or investigation-positive claims. A leakage-safe 70/15/15 training-validation-test protocol is reported, with 2,250 claims in the untouched test set. FraudLens AI is benchmarked against logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and an artificial neural network. On the supplied test results, FraudLens AI achieved 97.0% accuracy, 85.9% precision, 84.0% recall, an 85.0% F1-score, and a 0.967 ROC-AUC, while producing 31 false positives and 36 false negatives. Its mean inference latency was 11.6 ms per claim, corresponding to approximately 86 claims per second. The strongest normalized features were claim amount/severity (0.16), anomaly score (0.14), narrative inconsistency (0.12), and provider risk (0.11). These findings indicate that multi-signal fusion can improve fraud prioritization relative to the benchmark models in the supplied results. Because the source material provides aggregate outcomes rather than the underlying 15,000 row-level records, the reported model results are analyzed as supplied and are not presented as an independently reproduced training experiment.
Suggested Citation
Emmanuel Abagna, 2024.
"FraudLens AI for Intelligent Claims Forensics and Real-Time Insurance Fraud Detection in the United States,"
International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10(4), pages 1161-1176, August.
Handle:
RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v10:y2024:i4:id:2129
DOI: 10.32628/CSEIT261233040
Note: Article URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/view/2129
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v10:y2024:i4:id:2129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (USA) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrcseit.com/home .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.