IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jbh/ijsrcs/v10y2024i3id233.html

Survey on Systematic Analysis of Deep Learning Models Compare to Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Sheshang Degadwala
  • Dhairya Vyas

Abstract

This survey provides a comprehensive analysis of the systematic differences and advancements between deep learning (DL) and traditional machine learning (ML) models. By examining a wide array of research papers, the study highlights the unique strengths and applications of both methodologies. Deep learning, with its multi-layered neural networks, excels in handling large, unstructured datasets, making significant strides in image and speech recognition, natural language processing, and complex pattern recognition tasks. Conversely, traditional machine learning models, which rely on feature extraction and simpler algorithms, remain highly effective in structured data scenarios such as classification, regression, and clustering problems. The survey elucidates the criteria for choosing between DL and ML, focusing on factors like data size, computational resources, and specific application requirements. Furthermore, it discusses the evolving landscape of hybrid models that integrate DL and ML techniques to leverage the strengths of both approaches. This analysis provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners aiming to deploy the most suitable AI models for their specific needs, emphasizing the importance of contextual understanding in the rapidly advancing field of artificial intelligence.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheshang Degadwala & Dhairya Vyas, 2024. "Survey on Systematic Analysis of Deep Learning Models Compare to Machine Learning," International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10(3), pages 556-566, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v10:y2024:i3:id:233
    DOI: 10.32628/CSEIT24103206
    Note: Article URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/view/CSEIT24103206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/view/CSEIT24103206
    File Function: Article URL
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/download/CSEIT24103206/CSEIT24103206
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32628/CSEIT24103206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v10:y2024:i3:id:233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (USA) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrcseit.com/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.