Author
Listed:
- Semiu Temidayo Fasasi
- Oluwapelumi Joseph Adebowale
- Zamathula Q.S. Nwokediegwu
Abstract
Sensor technologies are increasingly integral to a wide range of industrial, environmental, and infrastructural applications. However, their performance is often compromised by environmental interference such as temperature fluctuations, humidity, particulates, and electromagnetic noise. Traditional evaluation methods, focused primarily on laboratory-based metrics, fail to account for the real-world variability these technologies encounter in the field. This paper presents a comparative evaluation model designed to assess sensor performance under such interference systematically. The model introduces a structured framework based on four key dimensions, robustness, response fidelity, degradation rate, and adaptability, which together offer a comprehensive view of sensor resilience. A tailored set of performance metrics, including accuracy loss under thermal variation and detection delays in high humidity, provides measurable criteria for assessing sensor suitability. To accommodate application-specific priorities, the model incorporates a weighted comparative mechanism using multi-criteria decision analysis principles. Sensor types are categorized by operational principle and mode, then evaluated across environmental challenges using a conceptual performance matrix. The analysis reveals trade-offs between sensitivity, robustness, cost, and response time across sensor classes. By bridging the gap between laboratory performance and field reliability, the proposed model offers valuable guidance for sensor selection, design improvement, and future benchmarking efforts.
Suggested Citation
Semiu Temidayo Fasasi & Oluwapelumi Joseph Adebowale & Zamathula Q.S. Nwokediegwu, 2024.
"Sensor Technology Performance under Environmental Interference: A Comparative Evaluation Model,"
International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10(3), pages 843-855, June.
Handle:
RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v10:y2024:i3:id:1626
DOI: 10.32628/CSEIT25113468
Note: Article URL: https://ijsrcseit.com/home/article/view/CSEIT25113468
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbh:ijsrcs:v10:y2024:i3:id:1626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (USA) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrcseit.com/home .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.