IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jbe/jbefjr/v18y2025i0p1-18.html

Behavioral Economics Interventions to Reduce Insufficient Effort Responses in Open-Ended Questions of Online Surveys: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Kawanishi, Takeru
  • Horiuchi, Aiko
  • Sasaki, Shusaku

Abstract

The increasing use of open-ended questions in marketing research, particularly for collecting opinions on advertising videos, has raised concerns about insufficient effort responses (IERs), such as meaningless character strings. This study examines the effectiveness of three behavioral economics interventions (nudges) in mitigating IERs through a randomized controlled trial (n=10,324) conducted in an online survey. The interventions include (1) commitment, (2) a loss-framed message, and (3) a gain-framed message. All three interventions reduced both the proportion of respondents providing IERs and the total number of IERs. The loss-framed and gain-framed messages further decreased the selection of intermediate responses, which are commonly associated with low-effort answering. Importantly, no adverse effects, such as increased survey dropout rates or heightened response burden, were observed. On the contrary, the gain-framed message led to a reduction in both dropout rates and perceived response burden. These findings suggest that behavioral economics interventions can enhance data quality in online surveys by reducing inefficiencies caused by IERs in responses to open-ended questions.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:jbe:jbefjr:v:18:y:2025:i:0:p:1-18
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jbef/18/0/18_1/_pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbe:jbefjr:v:18:y:2025:i:0:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: JBEF Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.