IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jbe/jbefjr/v17y2024i0p3-21.html

Misperceptions about Fathers’ Parental Leave Taking

Author

Listed:
  • Takeo, Yoh
  • Nakayama, Hitomi
  • Tadachi, Mayu
  • Mitani, Yohei

Abstract

Paternity leave, fathers’ parental leave, has been implemented in many countries. The uptake rate of paternity leave remains low in Japan, though the Child Care and Family Care Leave Act allows all employees, including men, to take parental leave. A possible reason for the low uptake rate may be misperceptions about others’ opinions. This study conducted an online survey with 300 men and women in their 20s, 40s, and 60s, asking them whether they approve or disapprove of paternity leave and asking them to guess the approval rate of other survey participants by gender and age group. We find the existence of misperceptions, showing that the average of the perceived approval rate of others (51.7%) is significantly lower than the actual approval rate (91.0%).We also find that for the older age group, the perceived approval rate is lower, and the magnitude of misperceptions is larger. Furthermore, the perceived approval rate is lower for men within the same age group. Additionally, the results reveal that men’s willingness to take paternity leave is positively associated with perceptions toward women in their 20s.

Suggested Citation

  • Takeo, Yoh & Nakayama, Hitomi & Tadachi, Mayu & Mitani, Yohei, 2024. "Misperceptions about Fathers’ Parental Leave Taking," Journal of Behavioral Economics and Finance, Association of Behavioral Economics and Finance, vol. 17(0), pages 3-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:jbe:jbefjr:v:17:y:2024:i:0:p:3-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jbef/17/0/17_3/_pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbe:jbefjr:v:17:y:2024:i:0:p:3-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: JBEF Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.