The Fate of Spatial Dilemmas with Different Fuzzy Measures of Success
Cooperation among self-interested individuals pervades nature and seems essential to explain several landmarks in the evolution of live organisms, from prebiotic chemistry through to the origins of human societies. The iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD) has been widely used in different contexts, ranging from social sciences to biology, to elucidate the evolution of cooperation. In this work we approach the problem from a different angle. We consider a system of adaptive agents, in a two dimensional grid, playing the IPD governed by Pavlovian strategies. We investigate the effect of different possible measures of success (MSs) used by the players to assess their performance in the game. These MSs involve quantities such as: the utilities of a player in each round U, his cumulative score (or "capital" or \'wealth\') W, his neighbourhood "welfare" and combinations of them. The agents play sequentially with one of their neighbours and the two players update their "behaviour" (C or D) using fuzzy logic which seems more appropriate to evaluate an imprecise concept like "success" than binary logic. The steady states are characterised by different degrees of cooperation, "economic geographies" (population structure and maps of capital) and "efficiencies" which depend dramatically on the MS. In particular, some MSs produce patterns of "segregation" and "exploitation".
Volume (Year): 8 (2005)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2004-34-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Flaminio Squazzoni)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.