IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v73y2025i3p1412-1429.html

When Does the Gittins Policy Have Asymptotically Optimal Response Time Tail in the M/G/1?

Author

Listed:
  • Ziv Scully

    (School of Operations Research and Information Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853)

  • Lucas van Kreveld

    (Stochastic Operations Research, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands)

Abstract

We consider scheduling in the M/G/1 queue with unknown job sizes. It is known that the Gittins policy minimizes mean response time in this setting. However, the behavior of the tail of response time under Gittins is poorly understood, even in the large-response-time limit. Characterizing Gittins’s asymptotic tail behavior is important because if Gittins has optimal tail asymptotics, then it simultaneously provides optimal mean response time and good tail performance. In this work, we give the first comprehensive account of Gittins’s asymptotic tail behavior. For heavy-tailed job sizes, we find that Gittins always has asymptotically optimal tail. The story for light-tailed job sizes is less clear-cut: Gittins’s tail can be optimal, pessimal, or in between. To remedy this, we show that a modification of Gittins avoids pessimal tail behavior, while achieving near-optimal mean response time.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziv Scully & Lucas van Kreveld, 2025. "When Does the Gittins Policy Have Asymptotically Optimal Response Time Tail in the M/G/1?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(3), pages 1412-1429, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:73:y:2025:i:3:p:1412-1429
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2022.0038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.0038
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2022.0038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Wierman & Bert Zwart, 2012. "Is Tail-Optimal Scheduling Possible?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1249-1257, October.
    2. Linus Schrage, 1968. "Letter to the Editor—A Proof of the Optimality of the Shortest Remaining Processing Time Discipline," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 687-690, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikhil Bansal & Bart Kamphorst & Bert Zwart, 2018. "Achievable Performance of Blind Policies in Heavy Traffic," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 949-964, August.
    2. Konstantin Avrachenkov & Patrick Brown & Natalia Osipova, 2009. "Optimal choice of threshold in Two Level Processor Sharing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 21-39, September.
    3. Samuli Aalto & Ziv Scully, 2023. "Minimizing the mean slowdown in the M/G/1 queue," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 187-210, August.
    4. Thomas Kittsteiner & Benny Moldovanu, 2005. "Priority Auctions and Queue Disciplines That Depend on Processing Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 236-248, February.
    5. Samuli Aalto & Urtzi Ayesta, 2009. "SRPT applied to bandwidth-sharing networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 3-19, September.
    6. Azizoglu, Meral & Cakmak, Ergin & Kondakci, Suna, 2001. "A flexible flowshop problem with total flow time minimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(3), pages 528-538, August.
    7. Łukasz Kruk, 2017. "Edge minimality of EDF resource sharing networks," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 86(2), pages 331-366, October.
    8. Samuli Aalto, 2006. "M/G/1/MLPS compared with M/G/1/PS within service time distribution class IMRL," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 64(2), pages 309-325, October.
    9. Samuli Aalto & Ziv Scully, 2022. "On the Gittins index for multistage jobs," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 353-371, December.
    10. Mor Harchol-Balter, 2021. "Open problems in queueing theory inspired by datacenter computing," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 3-37, February.
    11. Yonatan Shadmi, 2022. "Fluid limits for shortest job first with aging," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 93-112, June.
    12. Nicole Megow & Tjark Vredeveld, 2014. "A Tight 2-Approximation for Preemptive Stochastic Scheduling," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 1297-1310, November.
    13. Douglas G. Down & H. Christian Gromoll & Amber L. Puha, 2009. "Fluid Limits for Shortest Remaining Processing Time Queues," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 880-911, November.
    14. Chengbin Chu, 1992. "A branch‐and‐bound algorithm to minimize total tardiness with different release dates," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 265-283, March.
    15. Sitters, R.A., 2009. "Efficient algorithms for average completion time scheduling," Serie Research Memoranda 0058, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    16. Luca Becchetti & Stefano Leonardi & Alberto Marchetti-Spaccamela & Guido Schäfer & Tjark Vredeveld, 2006. "Average-Case and Smoothed Competitive Analysis of the Multilevel Feedback Algorithm," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 85-108, February.
    17. Jing Dong & Rouba Ibrahim, 2025. "Shortest-Job-First Scheduling in Many-Server Queues with Impatient Customers and Noisy Service-Time Estimates," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(6), pages 3139-3155, November.
    18. Łukasz Kruk & Ewa Sokołowska, 2016. "Fluid Limits for Multiple-Input Shortest Remaining Processing Time Queues," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 1055-1092, August.
    19. Samuli Aalto, 2022. "Minimizing the mean slowdown in a single-server queue," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 373-375, April.
    20. Megow, Nicole & Schulz, Andreas S., 2004. "Scheduling to Minimize Average Completion Time Revisited: Deterministic On-line Algorithms," Working papers 4435-03, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:73:y:2025:i:3:p:1412-1429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.