IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v72y2024i2p684-698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment in the Common Good: Free Rider Effect and the Stability of Mixed Strategy Equilibria

Author

Listed:
  • Youngsoo Kim

    (Culverhouse College of Business, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487)

  • H. Dharma Kwon

    (Gies College of Business, Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820)

Abstract

In the game of investment in the common good, the free rider problem can delay the stakeholders’ actions in the form of a mixed strategy equilibrium. However, it has been recently shown that the commonly known form of mixed strategy equilibria of the stochastic war of attrition is destabilized by even the slightest degree of asymmetry between the players. Such extreme instability is contrary to the widely accepted notion that a mixed strategy equilibrium is the hallmark of the war of attrition. Motivated by this quandary, we search for a mixed strategy equilibrium in a stochastic game of investment in the common good. Our results show that, despite asymmetry, a mixed strategy equilibrium exists if the model takes into account the repeated investment opportunities. This class of mixed strategy equilibria disappear only if the asymmetry is sufficiently high. Because the mixed strategy equilibrium is less efficient than pure strategy equilibria, it behooves policy makers to prevent it by promoting a sufficiently high degree of asymmetry between the stakeholders through, for example, asymmetric subsidy.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngsoo Kim & H. Dharma Kwon, 2024. "Investment in the Common Good: Free Rider Effect and the Stability of Mixed Strategy Equilibria," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(2), pages 684-698, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:2:p:684-698
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2022.2371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2371
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2022.2371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:2:p:684-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.