Author
Listed:
- David B. Brown
(Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)
- Jingwei Zhang
(Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)
Abstract
Many stochastic dynamic programs (DPs) have a weakly coupled structure in that a set of linking constraints in each period couples an otherwise independent collection of subproblems. Two widely studied approximations of such problems are approximate linear programs (ALPs), which involve optimizing value function approximations that additively separate across subproblems, and Lagrangian relaxations, which involve relaxing the linking constraints. It is well known that both of these approximations provide upper bounds on the optimal value function in all states and that the ALP provides a tighter upper bound in the initial state. The purpose of this short paper is to provide theoretical justification for the fact that these upper bounds are often close if not identical. We show that (i) for any weakly coupled DP, the difference between these two upper bounds—the relaxation gap —is bounded from above in terms of the integrality gap of the separation problems associated with the ALP. (ii) If subproblem rewards are uniformly bounded and some broadly applicable conditions on the linking constraints hold, the relaxation gap is bounded from above by a constant that is independent of the number of subproblems. (iii) When the linking constraints are independent of subproblem states and have a unimodular structure, the relaxation gap equals zero. The conditions for (iii) hold in several widely studied problems: generalizations of restless bandit problems, online stochastic matching problems, network revenue management problems, and price-directed control of relocating resources. These findings generalize and unify existing results.
Suggested Citation
David B. Brown & Jingwei Zhang, 2023.
"Technical Note—On the Strength of Relaxations of Weakly Coupled Stochastic Dynamic Programs,"
Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 2374-2389, November.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:oropre:v:71:y:2023:i:6:p:2374-2389
DOI: 10.1287/opre.2022.2287
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:71:y:2023:i:6:p:2374-2389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.