Author
Listed:
- James R. Wilson
(Department of Industrial Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7906)
Abstract
Recently, Nelson et al. (2001a, b) formulated a class of combined screening-and-selection procedures for identifying the simulated system with optimal expected response when the number of alternatives is finite, but large enough to render conventional ranking-and-selection procedures impractical. Under a certain key assumption, they derived an additive decomposition lemma that provides a lower bound on the correct-selection probability when either the original or group-screening version of their combined screening-and-selection procedure is applied to randomly sampled normal populations with unknown and unequal variances. For both these procedures, we establish an improved lower bound on the correct-selection probability that is the product of (a) the probability that the best alternative will survive the first-stage screening procedure, and (b) the probability that the second-stage sampling-and-selection procedure will correctly identify the best alternative starting from the full set of alternatives. This multiplicative decomposition property offers a different perspective on the probabilistic structure of the entire class of combined screening-and-selection procedures developed by Nelson et al., and it does not require the key assumption of their additive decomposition lemma.
Suggested Citation
James R. Wilson, 2001.
"A Multiplicative Decomposition Property of the Screening-and-Selection Procedures of Nelson et al,"
Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 964-966, December.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:oropre:v:49:y:2001:i:6:p:964-966
DOI: 10.1287/opre.49.6.964.10013
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:49:y:2001:i:6:p:964-966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.