IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v50y2025i1p90-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polynomial Voting Rules

Author

Listed:
  • Wenpin Tang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027)

  • David D. Yao

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027)

Abstract

We propose and study a new class of polynomial voting rules for a general decentralized decision/consensus system, and more specifically for the proof-of-stake protocol. The main idea, inspired by the Penrose square-root law and the more recent quadratic voting rule, is to differentiate a voter’s voting power and the voter’s share (fraction of the total in the system). We show that, whereas voter shares form a martingale process that converges to a Dirichlet distribution, their voting powers follow a supermartingale process that decays to zero over time. This prevents any voter from controlling the voting process and, thus, enhances security. For both limiting results, we also provide explicit rates of convergence. When the initial total volume of votes (or stakes) is large, we show a phase transition in share stability (or the lack thereof), corresponding to the voter’s initial share relative to the total. We also study the scenario in which trading (of votes/stakes) among the voters is allowed and quantify the level of risk sensitivity (or risk aversion) in three categories, corresponding to the voter’s utility being a supermartingale, a submartingale, and a martingale. For each category, we identify the voter’s best strategy in terms of participation and trading.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenpin Tang & David D. Yao, 2025. "Polynomial Voting Rules," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 90-106, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:50:y:2025:i:1:p:90-106
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2023.0080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.0080
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2023.0080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:50:y:2025:i:1:p:90-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.