IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v48y2023i3p1496-1521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation

Author

Listed:
  • Chi Jin

    (Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544)

  • Zhuoran Yang

    (Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520)

  • Zhaoran Wang

    (Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)

  • Michael I. Jordan

    (University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720)

Abstract

Modern reinforcement learning (RL) is commonly applied to practical problems with an enormous number of states, where function approximation must be deployed to approximate either the value function or the policy. The introduction of function approximation raises a fundamental set of challenges involving computational and statistical efficiency, especially given the need to manage the exploration/exploitation trade-off. As a result, a core RL question remains open: how can we design provably efficient RL algorithms that incorporate function approximation? This question persists even in a basic setting with linear dynamics and linear rewards, for which only linear function approximation is needed. This paper presents the first provable RL algorithm with both polynomial run time and polynomial sample complexity in this linear setting, without requiring a “simulator” or additional assumptions. Concretely, we prove that an optimistic modification of least-squares value iteration—a classical algorithm frequently studied in the linear setting—achieves O ˜ ( d 3 H 3 T ) regret, where d is the ambient dimension of feature space, H is the length of each episode, and T is the total number of steps. Importantly, such regret is independent of the number of states and actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi Jin & Zhuoran Yang & Zhaoran Wang & Michael I. Jordan, 2023. "Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 1496-1521, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:48:y:2023:i:3:p:1496-1521
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2022.1309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2022.1309
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2022.1309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:48:y:2023:i:3:p:1496-1521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.