IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v47y2022i4p3207-3238.html

Pipeline Interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Eshwar Ram Arunachaleswaran

    (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Sampath Kannan

    (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Aaron Roth

    (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Juba Ziani

    (Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30318)

Abstract

We introduce the pipeline intervention problem, defined by a layered directed acyclic graph and a set of stochastic matrices governing transitions between successive layers. The graph is a stylized model for how people from different populations are presented opportunities, eventually leading to some reward. In our model, individuals are born into an initial position (i.e., some node in the first layer of the graph) according to a fixed probability distribution and then stochastically progress through the graph according to the transition matrices until they reach a node in the final layer of the graph; each node in the final layer has a reward associated with it. The pipeline intervention problem asks how to best make costly changes to the transition matrices governing people’s stochastic transitions through the graph subject to a budget constraint. We consider two objectives: social welfare maximization and a fairness-motivated maximin objective that seeks to maximize the value to the population (starting node) with the least expected value. We consider two variants of the maximin objective that turn out to be distinct, depending on whether we demand a deterministic solution or allow randomization. For each objective, we give an efficient approximation algorithm (an additive fully polynomial-time approximation scheme) for constant-width networks. We also tightly characterize the “price of fairness” in our setting: the ratio between the highest achievable social welfare and the social welfare consistent with a maximin optimal solution. Finally, we show that, for polynomial-width networks, even approximating the maximin objective to any constant factor is NP hard even for networks with constant depth. This shows that the restriction on the width in our positive results is essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Eshwar Ram Arunachaleswaran & Sampath Kannan & Aaron Roth & Juba Ziani, 2022. "Pipeline Interventions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 3207-3238, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:4:p:3207-3238
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2021.1245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1245
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2021.1245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Budish, 2011. "The Combinatorial Assignment Problem: Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 119(6), pages 1061-1103.
    2. Coate, Stephen & Loury, Glenn C, 1993. "Will Affirmative-Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(5), pages 1220-1240, December.
    3. Dean P. Foster & Rakesh V. Vohra, 1992. "An Economic Argument for Affirmative Action," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(2), pages 176-188, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiduan Wu & Rediet Abebe & Moritz Hardt & Ana-Andreea Stoica, 2025. "Policy Design in Long-Run Welfare Dynamics," Papers 2503.00632, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sampath Kannan & Mingzi Niu & Aaron Roth & Rakesh Vohra, 2021. "Best vs. All: Equity and Accuracy of Standardized Test Score Reporting," Papers 2102.07809, arXiv.org.
    2. Selman Erol & Camilo Garcia-Jimeno, 2024. "Civil Liberties and Social Structure," Working Paper Series WP 2024-05, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    3. Austen-Smith, David & Wallerstein, Michael, 2006. "Redistribution and affirmative action," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(10-11), pages 1789-1823, November.
    4. Junpei Komiyama & Shunya Noda, 2026. "On Statistical Discrimination as a Failure of Social Learning: A Multiarmed Bandit Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 442-455, January.
    5. David Neumark & Harry Holzer, 2000. "Assessing Affirmative Action," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 483-568, September.
    6. Siddique, Zahra, 2011. "Evidence on Caste Based Discrimination," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(S1), pages 146-159.
    7. Christopher Jung & Sampath Kannan & Changhwa Lee & Mallesh M. Pai & Aaron Roth & Rakesh Vohra, 2020. "Fair Prediction with Endogenous Behavior," Papers 2002.07147, arXiv.org.
    8. Sampath Kannan & Aaron Roth & Juba Ziani, 2018. "Downstream Effects of Affirmative Action," Papers 1808.09004, arXiv.org.
    9. Siddique, Zahra, 2008. "Caste Based Discrimination: Evidence and Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 3737, IZA Network @ LISER.
    10. Cecilia Conrad & Rhonda Sharpe, 1996. "The impact of the California Civil Rights Initiative (CCRI) on university and professional school admissions and the implications for the California Economy," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 25(1), pages 13-59, September.
    11. Conde-Ruiz, J. Ignacio & Ganuza, Juan José & Profeta, Paola, 2022. "Statistical discrimination and committees," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    12. Moro, Andrea & Norman, Peter, 2004. "A general equilibrium model of statistical discrimination," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 1-30, January.
    13. Laurence Kranich, 2017. "Historical discrimination and optimal remediation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(1), pages 239-265, January.
    14. Erlanson, Albin & Szwagrzak, Karol, 2013. "Strategy-Proof Package Assignment," Working Papers 2013:43, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    15. Kevin Lang & Ariella Kahn-Lang Spitzer, 2020. "Race Discrimination: An Economic Perspective," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 68-89, Spring.
    16. Klumpp, Tilman & Su, Xuejuan, 2013. "Second-order statistical discrimination," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 108-116.
    17. Aygün, Orhan & Turhan, Bertan, 2021. "How to De-reserve Reserves," ISU General Staff Papers 202103100800001123, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Parag A. Pathak & Alex Rees-Jones & Tayfun Sönmez, 2025. "Immigration Lottery Design: Engineered and Coincidental Consequences of H-1B Reforms," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 107(1), pages 1-13, January.
    19. Donal O'Neill & Olive Sweetman & Dirk van de Gaer, 2000. "Estimating Counterfactual Densities: An application to Black-White Wage Differentials in the U.S," Economics Department Working Paper Series n1040600, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    20. Shai Vardi & Alexandros Psomas & Eric Friedman, 2022. "Dynamic Fair Resource Division," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 945-968, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:4:p:3207-3238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.