IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v47y2022i4p3156-3183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Theoretical Framework for Instance Complexity of the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Rob Van Eynde

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium)

  • Mario Vanhoucke

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium; Vlerick Business School, Ghent 9000, Belgium; UCL School of Management, University College London, London E14 5AA, United Kingdom)

Abstract

The resource-constrained project scheduling problem (RCPSP) addresses the problem of constructing a schedule with minimum makespan for a set of activities, subject to precedence and resource constraints. Recent research introduced a data set with small instances that cannot be solved by the state-of-the-art algorithms, revealing a gap in our understanding of instance complexity. We propose a new theoretical framework for the instance complexity for the RCPSP, consecutively incorporating precedence constraints, resource constraints, and activity durations. Our approach contributes to the existing knowledge base in two ways. First, it is independent from solution algorithms, which enables generalisable conclusions. Second, the theoretical perspective enables a deeper understanding of the drivers of instance complexity. We evaluate the performance of our approach with a series of computational experiments. These show that our framework is a strong discriminator between easy and hard instances and explains a large fraction of CPU times of optimal solution algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Rob Van Eynde & Mario Vanhoucke, 2022. "A Theoretical Framework for Instance Complexity of the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 3156-3183, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:4:p:3156-3183
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2021.1237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1237
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2021.1237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:4:p:3156-3183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.