IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v47y2022i3p2310-2332.html

Asymptotically Optimal Sequential Design for Rank Aggregation

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Chen

    (Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10013)

  • Yunxiao Chen

    (Department of Statistics, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom)

  • Xiaoou Li

    (School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

Abstract

A sequential design problem for rank aggregation is commonly encountered in psychology, politics, marketing, sports, etc. In this problem, a decision maker is responsible for ranking K items by sequentially collecting noisy pairwise comparisons from judges. The decision maker needs to choose a pair of items for comparison in each step, decide when to stop data collection, and make a final decision after stopping based on a sequential flow of information. Because of the complex ranking structure, existing sequential analysis methods are not suitable. In this paper, we formulate the problem under a Bayesian decision framework and propose sequential procedures that are asymptotically optimal. These procedures achieve asymptotic optimality by seeking a balance between exploration (i.e., finding the most indistinguishable pair of items) and exploitation (i.e., comparing the most indistinguishable pair based on the current information). New analytical tools are developed for proving the asymptotic results, combining advanced change of measure techniques for handling the level crossing of likelihood ratios and classic large deviation results for martingales, which are of separate theoretical interest in solving complex sequential design problems. A mirror-descent algorithm is developed for the computation of the proposed sequential procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Chen & Yunxiao Chen & Xiaoou Li, 2022. "Asymptotically Optimal Sequential Design for Rank Aggregation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 2310-2332, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:3:p:2310-2332
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2021.1209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1209
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2021.1209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sahand Negahban & Sewoong Oh & Devavrat Shah, 2017. "Rank Centrality: Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 266-287, February.
    2. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555.
    3. Jay Bartroff & Matthew Finkelman & Tze Lai, 2008. "Modern Sequential Analysis and Its Applications to Computerized Adaptive Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 473-486, September.
    4. Sahand Negahban & Sewoong Oh & Devavrat Shah, 2017. "Rank Centrality: Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 266-287, February.
    5. Y. Mei, 2010. "Efficient scalable schemes for monitoring a large number of data streams," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(2), pages 419-433.
    6. Nathan Kallus & Madeleine Udell, 2020. "Dynamic Assortment Personalization in High Dimensions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 1020-1037, July.
    7. Thomas Saaty & Luis Vargas, 2012. "The possibility of group choice: pairwise comparisons and merging functions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(3), pages 481-496, March.
    8. H. Morrison, 1963. "Testable conditions for triads of paired comparison choices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 28(4), pages 369-390, December.
    9. Ballinger, T Parker & Wilcox, Nathaniel T, 1997. "Decisions, Error and Heterogeneity," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(443), pages 1090-1105, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yue Liu & Ethan X. Fang & Junwei Lu, 2023. "Lagrangian Inference for Ranking Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 202-223, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dipankar Das, 2023. "A Model of Competitive Assortment Planning Algorithm," Papers 2307.09479, arXiv.org.
    2. Dipankar Das, 2025. "Competitive product ranking algorithms and digital market laws," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Yue Liu & Ethan X. Fang & Junwei Lu, 2023. "Lagrangian Inference for Ranking Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 202-223, January.
    4. Milan Vojnović & Se-Young Yun & Kaifang Zhou, 2023. "Accelerated MM Algorithms for Inference of Ranking Scores from Comparison Data," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 1318-1342, July.
    5. Kameng Nip & Zhenbo Wang & Zizhuo Wang, 2021. "Assortment Optimization under a Single Transition Choice Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2122-2142, July.
    6. Ali Aouad & Adam N. Elmachtoub & Kris J. Ferreira & Ryan McNellis, 2023. "Market Segmentation Trees," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 648-667, March.
    7. Christis Katsouris, 2023. "Statistical Estimation for Covariance Structures with Tail Estimates using Nodewise Quantile Predictive Regression Models," Papers 2305.11282, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    8. Ali Aouad & Jacob Feldman & Danny Segev, 2023. "The Exponomial Choice Model for Assortment Optimization: An Alternative to the MNL Model?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2814-2832, May.
    9. Anna Conte & John D. Hey & Peter G. Moffatt, 2018. "Mixture models of choice under risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Experiments in Economics Decision Making and Markets, chapter 1, pages 3-12, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Hans-Martin von Gaudecker & Arthur van Soest & Erik Wengstrom, 2011. "Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(2), pages 664-694, April.
    11. Lu, Zexian & Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou, 2022. "Optimal parallel sequential change detection under generalized performance measures," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118348, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Johannes Buckenmaier & Michele Garagnani, 2020. "Stochastic choice and preference reversals," ECON - Working Papers 370, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jul 2021.
    13. Anna Timonina-Farkas & Ralf W. Seifert, 2023. "Information Retrieval Under Network Uncertainty: Robust Internet Ranking," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 2328-2351, November.
    14. Xingyu Fu & Ningyuan Chen & Pin Gao & Yang Li, 2026. "Privacy-Preserving Personalized Recommender Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 271-289, January.
    15. Julia Heger & Robert Klein, 2024. "Assortment optimization: a systematic literature review," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 46(4), pages 1099-1161, December.
    16. Ningyuan Chen & Ming Hu, 2023. "Frontiers in Service Science: Data-Driven Revenue Management: The Interplay of Data, Model, and Decisions," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 79-91, June.
    17. Wilcox, Nathaniel T., 2011. "'Stochastically more risk averse:' A contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 89-104, May.
    18. Tino Werner, 2022. "Elicitability of Instance and Object Ranking," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 123-140, June.
    19. Weijie Su, 2022. "You Are the Best Reviewer of Your Own Papers: The Isotonic Mechanism," Papers 2206.08149, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    20. Yangming Zhou & Jin-Kao Hao & Zhen Li, 2024. "Heuristic Search for Rank Aggregation with Application to Label Ranking," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 308-326, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:3:p:2310-2332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.