IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v47y2022i3p2186-2218.html

Small-Loss Bounds for Online Learning with Partial Information

Author

Listed:
  • Thodoris Lykouris

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Karthik Sridharan

    (Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850)

  • Éva Tardos

    (Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850)

Abstract

We consider the problem of adversarial (nonstochastic) online learning with partial-information feedback, in which, at each round, a decision maker selects an action from a finite set of alternatives. We develop a black-box approach for such problems in which the learner observes as feedback only losses of a subset of the actions that includes the selected action. When losses of actions are nonnegative, under the graph-based feedback model introduced by Mannor and Shamir, we offer algorithms that attain the so called “small-loss” o ( α L ⋆ ) regret bounds with high probability, where α is the independence number of the graph and L ⋆ is the loss of the best action. Prior to our work, there was no data-dependent guarantee for general feedback graphs even for pseudo-regret (without dependence on the number of actions, i.e., utilizing the increased information feedback). Taking advantage of the black-box nature of our technique, we extend our results to many other applications, such as combinatorial semi-bandits (including routing in networks), contextual bandits (even with an infinite comparator class), and learning with slowly changing (shifting) comparators. In the special case of multi-armed bandit and combinatorial semi-bandit problems, we provide optimal small-loss, high-probability regret guarantees of O ˜ ( d L ⋆ ) , where d is the number of actions, answering open questions of Neu. Previous bounds for multi-armed bandits and semi-bandits were known only for pseudo-regret and only in expectation. We also offer an optimal O ˜ ( κ L ⋆ ) regret guarantee for fixed feedback graphs with clique-partition number at most κ .

Suggested Citation

  • Thodoris Lykouris & Karthik Sridharan & Éva Tardos, 2022. "Small-Loss Bounds for Online Learning with Partial Information," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 2186-2218, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:3:p:2186-2218
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2021.1204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2021.1204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Yves Audibert & Sébastien Bubeck & Gábor Lugosi, 2014. "Regret in Online Combinatorial Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 31-45, February.
    2. Thomas M. Cover, 1991. "Universal Portfolios," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 1-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Foster, Dean P. & Vohra, Rakesh, 1999. "Regret in the On-Line Decision Problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 29(1-2), pages 7-35, October.
    2. Jin’an He & Shicheng Yin & Fangping Peng, 2024. "Weak aggregating specialist algorithm for online portfolio selection," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(6), pages 2405-2434, June.
    3. Seung-Hyun Moon & Yong-Hyuk Kim & Byung-Ro Moon, 2019. "Empirical investigation of state-of-the-art mean reversion strategies for equity markets," Papers 1909.04327, arXiv.org.
    4. Grillo, Marco & Kotłowski, Wojciech & Kadziński, Miłosz, 2025. "Ordinal regression meets online learning: Interactive preference learning for multiple criteria choice and ranking with provable guarantees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(3), pages 1003-1022.
    5. Rong Jin & David Simchi-Levi & Li Wang & Xinshang Wang & Sen Yang, 2021. "Shrinking the Upper Confidence Bound: A Dynamic Product Selection Problem for Urban Warehouses," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4756-4771, August.
    6. Xiyue Han & Alexander Schied, 2025. "Universal portfolios in continuous time: an approach in pathwise It\^o calculus," Papers 2504.11881, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    7. Horobet, Alexandra & Boubaker, Sabri & Belascu, Lucian & Negreanu, Cristina Carmencita & Dinca, Zeno, 2024. "Technology-driven advancements: Mapping the landscape of algorithmic trading literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Rémi Jézéquel & Dmitrii M. Ostrovskii & Pierre Gaillard, 2025. "Efficient and Near-Optimal Online Portfolio Selection," Post-Print hal-03787674, HAL.
    9. Man Yiu Tsang & Tony Sit & Hoi Ying Wong, 2022. "Adaptive Robust Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2206.01064, arXiv.org.
    10. Rad Niazadeh & Negin Golrezaei & Joshua Wang & Fransisca Susan & Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, 2023. "Online Learning via Offline Greedy Algorithms: Applications in Market Design and Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3797-3817, July.
    11. Luo, Yong & Zhu, Bo & Tang, Yong, 2014. "Simulated annealing algorithm for optimal capital growth," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 10-18.
    12. Erhan Bayraktar & Donghan Kim & Abhishek Tilva, 2024. "Quantifying dimensional change in stochastic portfolio theory," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 977-1021, July.
    13. Ormos, Mihály & Urbán, András & Zoltán, Tamás, 2009. "Logoptimális portfóliók empirikus vizsgálata [Empirical analysis of log-optimal portfolios]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 1-18.
    14. Fereydooni, Ali & Barak, Sasan & Asaad Sajadi, Seyed Mehrzad, 2024. "A novel online portfolio selection approach based on pattern matching and ESG factors," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    15. Jarrod Wilcox, 2020. "Better portfolios with higher moments," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(7), pages 569-580, December.
    16. Dmitry B. Rokhlin, 2021. "Relative utility bounds for empirically optimal portfolios," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 93(3), pages 437-462, June.
    17. Xi Chen & Yining Wang, 2023. "Robust Dynamic Pricing with Demand Learning in the Presence of Outlier Customers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 1362-1386, July.
    18. Vladimir V'yugin, 2014. "Log-Optimal Portfolio Selection Using the Blackwell Approachability Theorem," Papers 1410.5996, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.
    19. R'emi J'ez'equel & Dmitrii M. Ostrovskii & Pierre Gaillard, 2022. "Efficient and Near-Optimal Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2209.13932, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    20. Miquel Noguer i Alonso & Sonam Srivastava, 2020. "Deep Reinforcement Learning for Asset Allocation in US Equities," Papers 2010.04404, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:3:p:2186-2218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.