IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v47y2022i3p1875-1903.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fair Cake Division Under Monotone Likelihood Ratios

Author

Listed:
  • Siddharth Barman

    (Department of Computer Science and Automation, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India)

  • Nidhi Rathi

    (Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India)

Abstract

This work develops algorithmic results for the classic cake-cutting problem in which a divisible, heterogeneous resource (modeled as a cake) needs to be partitioned among agents with distinct preferences. We focus on a standard formulation of cake cutting wherein each agent must receive a contiguous piece of the cake. Although multiple hardness results exist in this setup for finding fair/efficient cake divisions, we show that, if the value densities of the agents satisfy the monotone likelihood ratio property (MLRP), then strong algorithmic results hold for various notions of fairness and economic efficiency. Addressing cake-cutting instances with MLRP, first we develop an algorithm that finds cake divisions (with connected pieces) that are envy free, up to an arbitrary precision. The time complexity of our algorithm is polynomial in the number of agents and the bit complexity of an underlying Lipschitz constant. We obtain similar positive results for maximizing social, egalitarian, and Nash social welfare. Many distribution families bear MLRP. In particular, this property holds if all the value densities belong to any one of the following families: Gaussian (with the same variance), linear, Poisson, and exponential distributions, linear translations of any log-concave function. Hence, through MLRP, the current work obtains novel cake-cutting algorithms for multiple distribution families.

Suggested Citation

  • Siddharth Barman & Nidhi Rathi, 2022. "Fair Cake Division Under Monotone Likelihood Ratios," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 1875-1903, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:3:p:1875-1903
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2021.1192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1192
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2021.1192?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:3:p:1875-1903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.