IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v47y2022i3p1781-1801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibria and Systemic Risk in Saturated Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Massai

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Giacomo Como

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy; Department of Automatic Control, Lund University, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden)

  • Fabio Fagnani

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

We undertake a fundamental study of network equilibria modeled as solutions of fixed-point equations for monotone linear functions with saturation nonlinearities. The considered model extends one originally proposed to study systemic risk in networks of financial institutions interconnected by mutual obligations. It is one of the simplest continuous models accounting for shock propagation phenomena and cascading failure effects. This model also characterizes Nash equilibria of constrained quadratic network games with strategic complementarities. We first derive explicit expressions for network equilibria and prove necessary and sufficient conditions for their uniqueness, encompassing and generalizing results available in the literature. Then, we study jump discontinuities of the network equilibria when the exogenous flows cross certain regions of measure 0 representable as graphs of continuous functions. Finally, we discuss some implications of our results in the two main motivating applications. In financial networks, this bifurcation phenomenon is responsible for how small shocks in the assets of a few nodes can trigger major aggregate losses to the system and cause the default of several agents. In constrained quadratic network games, it induces a blow-up behavior of the sensitivity of Nash equilibria with respect to the individual benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Massai & Giacomo Como & Fabio Fagnani, 2022. "Equilibria and Systemic Risk in Saturated Networks," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 1781-1801, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:3:p:1781-1801
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2021.1188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1188
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2021.1188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:3:p:1781-1801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.