IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v47y2022i2p1612-1630.html

Quasi-Polynomial Algorithms for Submodular Tree Orienteering and Directed Network Design Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Rohan Ghuge

    (Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

  • Viswanath Nagarajan

    (Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

Abstract

We consider the following general network design problem. The input is an asymmetric metric ( V , c ), root r ∈ V , monotone submodular function f : 2 V → R + , and budget B . The goal is to find an r -rooted arborescence T of cost at most B that maximizes f ( T ). Our main result is a simple quasi-polynomial time O ( log k log log k ) -approximation algorithm for this problem, in which k ≤ | V | is the number of vertices in an optimal solution. As a consequence, we obtain an O ( log 2 k log log k ) -approximation algorithm for directed (polymatroid) Steiner tree in quasi-polynomial time. We also extend our main result to a setting with additional length bounds at vertices, which leads to improved O ( log 2 k log log k ) -approximation algorithms for the single-source buy-at-bulk and priority Steiner tree problems. For the usual directed Steiner tree problem, our result matches the best previous approximation ratio but improves significantly on the running time. For polymatroid Steiner tree and single-source buy-at-bulk, our result improves prior approximation ratios by a logarithmic factor. For directed priority Steiner tree, our result seems to be the first nontrivial approximation ratio. Under certain complexity assumptions, our approximation ratios are the best possible (up to constant factors).

Suggested Citation

  • Rohan Ghuge & Viswanath Nagarajan, 2022. "Quasi-Polynomial Algorithms for Submodular Tree Orienteering and Directed Network Design Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 1612-1630, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:2:p:1612-1630
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2021.1181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1181
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2021.1181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Gouveia, 1998. "Using Variable Redefinition for Computing Lower Bounds for Minimum Spanning and Steiner Trees with Hop Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 180-188, May.
    2. Alice Paul & Daniel Freund & Aaron Ferber & David B. Shmoys & David P. Williamson, 2020. "Budgeted Prize-Collecting Traveling Salesman and Minimum Spanning Tree Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 576-590, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiaqi Wang & Weijun Xie & Ilya O. Ryzhov & Nikola Marković & Ge Ou, 2025. "D-Optimal Orienteering for Post-Earthquake Reconnaissance Planning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(5), pages 2375-2395, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Hermans & Roel Leus & Jannik Matuschke, 2022. "Exact and Approximation Algorithms for the Expanding Search Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 281-296, January.
    2. Moïse Blanchard & Alexandre Jacquillat & Patrick Jaillet, 2024. "Probabilistic Bounds on the k -Traveling Salesman Problem and the Traveling Repairman Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 1169-1191, May.
    3. Okan Arslan & Ola Jabali & Gilbert Laporte, 2020. "A Flexible, Natural Formulation for the Network Design Problem with Vulnerability Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 120-134, January.
    4. Akgün, Ibrahim & Tansel, Barbaros Ç., 2011. "New formulations of the Hop-Constrained Minimum Spanning Tree problem via Miller-Tucker-Zemlin constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 263-276, July.
    5. Naga V. C. Gudapati & Enrico Malaguti & Michele Monaci, 2022. "Network Design with Service Requirements: Scaling-up the Size of Solvable Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2571-2582, September.
    6. Banerjee, Dipayan, 2026. "Dynamic delivery request acceptance with strict geographic fairness: a classical yield management approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. De Boeck, Jérôme & Fortz, Bernard, 2018. "Extended formulation for hop constrained distribution network configuration problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 488-502.
    8. Quentin Botton & Bernard Fortz & Luis Gouveia & Michael Poss, 2013. "Benders Decomposition for the Hop-Constrained Survivable Network Design Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 13-26, February.
    9. Scheibe, Kevin P. & Ragsdale, Cliff T., 2009. "A model for the capacitated, hop-constrained, per-packet wireless mesh network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 773-784, September.
    10. Jiaqi Wang & Weijun Xie & Ilya O. Ryzhov & Nikola Marković & Ge Ou, 2025. "D-Optimal Orienteering for Post-Earthquake Reconnaissance Planning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(5), pages 2375-2395, September.
    11. Iago A. Carvalho & Amadeu A. Coco, 2023. "On solving bi-objective constrained minimum spanning tree problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 301-323, September.
    12. Sophia Saller & Jana Koehler & Andreas Karrenbauer, 2025. "A survey on approximability of traveling salesman problems using the TSP-T3CO definition scheme," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 351(3), pages 2129-2190, August.
    13. Luis Gouveia & Thomas Magnanti & Cristina Requejo, 2006. "An intersecting tree model for odd-diameter-constrained minimum spanning and Steiner trees," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 19-39, September.
    14. Costa, Alysson M. & Cordeau, Jean-François & Laporte, Gilbert, 2008. "Fast heuristics for the Steiner tree problem with revenues, budget and hop constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 68-78, October.
    15. Gouveia, Luís & Paias, Ana & Ponte, Mafalda, 2023. "The travelling salesman problem with positional consistency constraints: An application to healthcare services," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 960-989.
    16. Pirkul, Hasan & Soni, Samit, 2003. "New formulations and solution procedures for the hop constrained network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 126-140, July.
    17. Luis Gouveia & Pedro Patrício & Amaro Sousa, 2016. "Lexicographical minimization of routing hops in hop-constrained node survivable networks," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 417-434, June.
    18. Gouveia, Luis & Requejo, Cristina, 2001. "A new Lagrangean relaxation approach for the hop-constrained minimum spanning tree problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(3), pages 539-552, August.
    19. Qing Zhao & Zhen Li & Jianqiang Li & Jianxiong Guo & Xingjian Ding & Deying Li, 2025. "Uav trajectory optimization for maximizing the ToI-based data utility in wireless sensor networks," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Ivana Ljubić & Stefan Gollowitzer, 2013. "Layered Graph Approaches to the Hop Constrained Connected Facility Location Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 256-270, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:2:p:1612-1630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.