IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v47y2022i2p1229-1246.html

A New Augmented Lagrangian Method for MPCCs—Theoretical and Numerical Comparison with Existing Augmented Lagrangian Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Guo

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Zhibin Deng

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Big Data Mining and Knowledge Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

Abstract

We propose a new augmented Lagrangian (AL) method for solving the mathematical program with complementarity constraints (MPCC), where the complementarity constraints are left out of the AL function and treated directly. Two observations motivate us to propose this method: The AL subproblems are closer to the original problem in terms of the constraint structure; and the AL subproblems can be solved efficiently by a nonmonotone projected gradient method, in which we have closed-form solutions at each iteration. The former property helps us show that the proposed method converges globally to an M-stationary (better than C-stationary) point under MPCC relaxed constant positive linear dependence condition. Theoretical comparison with existing AL methods demonstrates that the proposed method is superior in terms of the quality of accumulation points and the strength of assumptions. Numerical comparison, based on problems in MacMPEC, validates the theoretical results.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Guo & Zhibin Deng, 2022. "A New Augmented Lagrangian Method for MPCCs—Theoretical and Numerical Comparison with Existing Augmented Lagrangian Methods," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 1229-1246, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:2:p:1229-1246
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2021.1165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1165
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2021.1165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M.L. Flegel & C. Kanzow, 2005. "Abadie-Type Constraint Qualification for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 595-614, March.
    2. Holger Scheel & Stefan Scholtes, 2000. "Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints: Stationarity, Optimality, and Sensitivity," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 1-22, February.
    3. A. Izmailov & A. Pogosyan & M. Solodov, 2012. "Semismooth Newton method for the lifted reformulation of mathematical programs with complementarity constraints," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 199-221, January.
    4. Lei Guo & Gui-Hua Lin, 2013. "Notes on Some Constraint Qualifications for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 600-616, March.
    5. Lei Guo & Gui-Hua Lin & Jane J. Ye, 2013. "Second-Order Optimality Conditions for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 33-64, July.
    6. X. M. Hu & D. Ralph, 2004. "Convergence of a Penalty Method for Mathematical Programming with Complementarity Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 365-390, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Xu & Guyan Ni & Mengshi Zhang, 2024. "Bounds of the Solution Set to the Polynomial Complementarity Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 146-164, October.
    2. Yan-Chao Liang & Yue-Wen Liu & Gui-Hua Lin & Xide Zhu, 2023. "New Constraint Qualifications for Mathematical Programs with Second-Order Cone Complementarity Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 199(3), pages 1249-1280, December.
    3. Christian Kanzow & Patrick Mehlitz, 2022. "Convergence Properties of Monotone and Nonmonotone Proximal Gradient Methods Revisited," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 624-646, November.
    4. Lei Guo & Gaoxi Li, 2024. "Approximation Methods for a Class of Non-Lipschitz Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 202(3), pages 1421-1445, September.
    5. Gao-Xi Li & Xin-Min Yang & Xian-Jun Long, 2025. "Partial augmented Lagrangian method for non-Lipschitz mathematical programs with complementarity constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 345-379, June.
    6. Roberto Andreani & Mariana da Rosa & Leonardo D. Secchin, 2026. "A New Constant-Rank-Type Condition Related to MFCQ and Local Error Bounds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 1-26, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen Huy Chieu & Gue Myung Lee, 2014. "Constraint Qualifications for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints and their Local Preservation Property," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 755-776, December.
    2. Christian Kanzow & Alexandra Schwartz, 2015. "The Price of Inexactness: Convergence Properties of Relaxation Methods for Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints Revisited," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 253-275, February.
    3. Jane J. Ye & Jin Zhang, 2014. "Enhanced Karush–Kuhn–Tucker Conditions for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 777-794, December.
    4. Yan-Chao Liang & Yue-Wen Liu & Gui-Hua Lin & Xide Zhu, 2023. "New Constraint Qualifications for Mathematical Programs with Second-Order Cone Complementarity Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 199(3), pages 1249-1280, December.
    5. Christian Kanzow & Alexandra Schwartz, 2014. "Convergence properties of the inexact Lin-Fukushima relaxation method for mathematical programs with complementarity constraints," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 249-262, October.
    6. Alberto Ramos, 2019. "Two New Weak Constraint Qualifications for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints and Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 566-591, November.
    7. Yogendra Pandey & Shashi Kant Mishra, 2016. "Duality for Nonsmooth Optimization Problems with Equilibrium Constraints, Using Convexificators," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 694-707, November.
    8. Balendu Bhooshan Upadhyay & Arnav Ghosh, 2023. "On Constraint Qualifications for Mathematical Programming Problems with Vanishing Constraints on Hadamard Manifolds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 1-35, October.
    9. Filippo Pecci & Edo Abraham & Ivan Stoianov, 2017. "Penalty and relaxation methods for the optimal placement and operation of control valves in water supply networks," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 201-223, May.
    10. Patrick Mehlitz & Alain B. Zemkoho, 2021. "Sufficient Optimality Conditions in Bilevel Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 1573-1598, November.
    11. Peng Zhang & Jin Zhang & Gui-Hua Lin & Xinmin Yang, 2019. "New Constraint Qualifications for S-Stationarity for MPEC with Nonsmooth Objective," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(02), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Anjali Rawat & Vinay Singh, 2026. "Augmented Lagrangian Neural Network for Solving Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 1-36, April.
    13. Jean C. A. Medeiros & Ademir A. Ribeiro & Mael Sachine & Leonardo D. Secchin, 2025. "A Practical Second-Order Optimality Condition for Cardinality-Constrained Problems with Application to an Augmented Lagrangian Method," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 206(2), pages 1-25, August.
    14. Daniel Ralph & Oliver Stein, 2011. "The C-Index: A New Stability Concept for Quadratic Programs with Complementarity Constraints," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 504-526, August.
    15. Giandomenico Mastroeni & Letizia Pellegrini & Alberto Peretti, 2021. "Some numerical aspects on a method for solving linear problems with complementarity constraints," Working Papers 16/2021, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    16. Helmut Gfrerer & Jane J. Ye & Jinchuan Zhou, 2022. "Second-Order Optimality Conditions for Nonconvex Set-Constrained Optimization Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 2344-2365, August.
    17. Hu, X. & Ralph, R., 2006. "Using EPECs to model bilevel games in restructured electricity markets with locational prices," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0619, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    18. H. Luo & X. Sun & Y. Xu & H. Wu, 2010. "On the convergence properties of modified augmented Lagrangian methods for mathematical programming with complementarity constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 217-232, February.
    19. H. Z. Luo & X. L. Sun & Y. F. Xu, 2010. "Convergence Properties of Modified and Partially-Augmented Lagrangian Methods for Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 489-506, June.
    20. Jean-Pierre Dussault & Mounir Haddou & Abdeslam Kadrani & Tangi Migot, 2020. "On Approximate Stationary Points of the Regularized Mathematical Program with Complementarity Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 186(2), pages 504-522, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:47:y:2022:i:2:p:1229-1246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.