IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v45y2020i3p797-832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Control Policies Approaching Hierarchical Greedy Ideal Performance in Heavy Traffic for Resource Sharing Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Amarjit Budhiraja

    (Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599)

  • Dane Johnson

    (Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599)

Abstract

We consider resource sharing networks of the form introduced in work of Massoulié and Roberts as models for Internet flows. The goal is to study the open problem, formulated in Harrison et al. (2014) [Harrison JM, Mandayam C, Shah D, Yang Y (2014) Resource sharing networks: Overview and an open problem. Stochastic Systems 4(2):524–555.], of constructing simple form rate-allocation policies for broad families of resource sharing networks with associated costs converging to the hierarchical greedy ideal performance in the heavy traffic limit. We consider two types of cost criteria: an infinite horizon discounted cost and a long-time average cost per unit time. We introduce a sequence of rate-allocation control policies that are determined in terms of certain thresholds for the scaled queue-length processes and prove that, under conditions, both type of costs associated with these policies converge in the heavy traffic limit to the corresponding hierarchical greedy ideal (HGI) performance. The conditions needed for these results are satisfied by all the examples considered in the above cited paper of Harrison et al.

Suggested Citation

  • Amarjit Budhiraja & Dane Johnson, 2020. "Control Policies Approaching Hierarchical Greedy Ideal Performance in Heavy Traffic for Resource Sharing Networks," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 797-832, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:45:y:2020:i:3:p:797-832
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2019.1007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2019.1007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2019.1007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:45:y:2020:i:3:p:797-832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.