IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v72y2026i7p6350-6367.html

Model Aggregation for Risk Evaluation and Robust Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Tiantian Mao

    (Department of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Ruodu Wang

    (Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Qinyu Wu

    (Department of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

Abstract

We introduce a new approach for prudent risk evaluation based on stochastic dominance, and it is called the model aggregation (MA) approach. In contrast to the classic worst case risk (WR) approach, the MA approach produces not only a robust value of risk evaluation but also a robust distributional model, independent of any specific risk measure. The MA risk evaluation can be computed through explicit formulas in the lattice theory of stochastic dominance, and under some standard assumptions, the MA robust optimization admits a convex program reformulation. The MA approach for Wasserstein and mean-variance uncertainty sets admits explicit formulas for the obtained robust models. Via an equivalence property between the MA and WR approaches, new axiomatic characterizations are obtained for the value at risk and the expected shortfall (also known as conditional value at risk). The new approach is illustrated with various risk measures and examples from portfolio optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiantian Mao & Ruodu Wang & Qinyu Wu, 2026. "Model Aggregation for Risk Evaluation and Robust Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(7), pages 6350-6367, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:72:y:2026:i:7:p:6350-6367
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.03523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03523
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:72:y:2026:i:7:p:6350-6367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.