IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v72y2026i6p4871-4888.html

How Does Going Public Affect Employee Satisfaction? Evidence from Glassdoor Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Li

    (Steed School of Accounting, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019)

  • Jedson Pinto

    (School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

Abstract

We examine how initial public offerings (IPOs) influence employees’ satisfaction with their employers. Using millions of company reviews and a generalized difference-in-differences method, we document that employees become less satisfied after their employers go public. The effect is driven by employees who joined the company before the IPO rather than those who joined after it and is stronger for employees whose tasks relate to regulatory compliance, for smaller firms, and firms with Big 4 auditors at the IPO. The effect is weaker for IPO firms in industries with low environmental, social, and governance (especially social) reputation risk. Using the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act to explore changes in regulatory burdens associated with an IPO, we find that the adverse effect of an IPO on employee satisfaction is weaker for IPO firms that benefit from reduced regulatory burden. Overall, our findings provide novel insights into how going public can affect employee welfare and one potential mechanism behind this effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Li & Jedson Pinto, 2026. "How Does Going Public Affect Employee Satisfaction? Evidence from Glassdoor Reviews," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(6), pages 4871-4888, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:72:y:2026:i:6:p:4871-4888
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.04285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.04285
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.04285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:72:y:2026:i:6:p:4871-4888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.