IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v72y2026i6p4633-4651.html

OTC Discount

Author

Listed:
  • Calebe de Roure

    (Reserve Bank of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia)

  • Emanuel Moench

    (Department of Finance, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, 60322 Frankfurt, Germany; and Centre for Economic Policy Research, 75007 Paris, France)

  • Loriana Pelizzon

    (Centre for Economic Policy Research, 75007 Paris, France; and Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany; and Department of Finance, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany; and Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30121 Venice, Italy)

  • Michael Schneider

    (Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany; and Research Centre, Deutsche Bundesbank, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany)

Abstract

We document a pecking order of transaction costs in the interdealer market for German sovereign bonds, where three trading protocols coexist. Dealers can trade over the counter (OTC), either bilaterally or via brokers, as well as on an exchange. Trading on the exchange is more expensive than OTC, and broker-intermediated trades are more costly than bilateral OTC trades. The existence of an OTC discount is difficult to square with theories centered around search-and-bargaining frictions but is in line with models of hybrid markets based on information frictions. Consistently, we show that dealers’ information impacts their choice of trading protocol and that the pecking order of transaction costs is aligned with the informational content of order flows across protocols. Search and bargaining as well as information proxies explain differences in OTC discount within protocols. A realistic description of hybrid markets thus requires both types of frictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Calebe de Roure & Emanuel Moench & Loriana Pelizzon & Michael Schneider, 2026. "OTC Discount," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(6), pages 4633-4651, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:72:y:2026:i:6:p:4633-4651
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.00194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00194
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:72:y:2026:i:6:p:4633-4651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.