Author
Listed:
- Fabio B. Gaertner
(Department of Accounting and Information Systems, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706)
- Jeffrey L. Hoopes
(Accounting Area, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599)
- Stacie O. Kelley
(Department of Accounting and Information Systems, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706)
- Max Pflitsch
(Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften, International Business Taxation, TU Dortmund University, 44221 Dortmund, Germany)
Abstract
The Inflation Reduction Act establishes a new 15% corporate minimum tax on the adjusted financial accounting income for large U.S. corporations. Although the minimum tax is estimated to raise $222 billion over 10 years, some fear firms will manipulate their accounting earnings to reduce their tax liabilities, resulting in less revenue raised. Using an event study, we examine the extent to which investors believe this tax will reduce firm value. We examine stock market reactions around key legislative developments leading to the enactment of the book minimum tax. Our findings show targeted firms experience significantly lower stock returns than nontargeted firms during the enactment process (about 1.4%–1.8% of firm value). In aggregate, our findings are consistent with the Joint Committee on Taxation’s revenue estimates. In cross-sectional tests, we fail to find evidence that firms most likely to avoid the tax via earnings management experience more positive returns. We also fail to find less negative returns for firms most likely to pass on the tax to consumers. Overall, our results suggest investors do not expect firms to avoid this tax. Instead, they appear to expect a significant portion of the corporate minimum tax to be remitted by firms and borne by shareholders.
Suggested Citation
Fabio B. Gaertner & Jeffrey L. Hoopes & Stacie O. Kelley & Max Pflitsch, 2025.
"Investor Perceptions of the Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7800-7820, September.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:9:p:7800-7820
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2024.04750
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:9:p:7800-7820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.