IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i7p6298-6318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simple and Optimal Policy Design with Safety Against Heavy-Tailed Risk for Stochastic Bandits

Author

Listed:
  • David Simchi-Levi

    (Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Zeyu Zheng

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720)

  • Feng Zhu

    (Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

We study the stochastic multi-armed bandit problem and design new policies that enjoy both optimal regret expectation and light-tailed risk for regret distribution. We first find that any policy that obtains the optimal instance-dependent expected regret could incur a heavy-tailed regret tail risk that decays slowly with T . We then focus on policies that achieve optimal worst-case expected regret. We design a novel policy that (i) enjoys the worst-case optimality for regret expectation and (ii) has the worst-case tail probability of incurring a regret larger than any regret threshold that decays exponentially with respect to T . The decaying rate is proved to be optimal for all worst-case optimal policies. Our proposed policy achieves a delicate balance between doing more exploration at the beginning of the time horizon and doing more exploitation when approaching the end, compared with standard confidence-bound-based policies. We also enhance the policy design to accommodate the “any-time” setting where T is unknown a priori, highlighting “lifelong exploration”, and prove equivalently desired policy performances as compared with the “fixed-time” setting with known T . From a managerial perspective, we show through numerical experiments that our new policy design yields similar efficiency and better safety compared to celebrated policies. Our policy design is preferable especially when (i) there is a risk of underestimating the volatility profile, or (ii) there is a challenge of tuning policy hyper-parameters. We conclude by extending our proposed policy design to the stochastic linear bandit setting that leads to both worst-case optimality in terms of regret expectation and light-tailed risk on regret distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • David Simchi-Levi & Zeyu Zheng & Feng Zhu, 2025. "A Simple and Optimal Policy Design with Safety Against Heavy-Tailed Risk for Stochastic Bandits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(7), pages 6298-6318, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:7:p:6298-6318
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.03512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03512
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:7:p:6298-6318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.