IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i7p5910-5932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reputation Burning: Analyzing the Impact of Brand Sponsorship on Social Influencers

Author

Listed:
  • Mengjie (Magie) Cheng

    (Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163)

  • Shunyuan Zhang

    (Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163)

Abstract

The growth of the influencer marketing industry warrants an empirical examination of the effect of posting sponsored videos on influencers’ reputations. We collected a novel data set of user-generated YouTube videos created by prominent English-speaking influencers in the beauty and style category. We extracted a rich set of theory-driven video features and used DiNardo-Fortin-Lemieux reweighting to construct comparable treatment and control groups matched at the influencer-video level. The empirical analysis of the matched sample revealed a reputation-burning effect ; that is, posting a sponsored video, compared with posting an equivalent organic video, cost the influencers 0.19% of their reputation (operationalized as the number of subscribers). The reputation-burning effect was stronger among the influencers with larger audiences. An analysis of likes, comments, and comment texts revealed a larger gap in audience response between sponsored and organic videos among the influencers with larger (versus smaller) audiences. The reputation-burning effect was mitigated when a high fit existed between the sponsored content and the influencer’s “usual” content and when the promoted brand was less well known. Our study empirically tested the assumption of several theoretical works. Moreover, it contributes to the literature on influencer marketing and celebrity endorsements and provides managerial implications for influencers, brands, and social media platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengjie (Magie) Cheng & Shunyuan Zhang, 2025. "Reputation Burning: Analyzing the Impact of Brand Sponsorship on Social Influencers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(7), pages 5910-5932, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:7:p:5910-5932
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.00193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00193
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:7:p:5910-5932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.