IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i6p5268-5287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Power of Simple Menus in Robust Selling Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Shixin Wang

    (Department of Decisions, Operations and Technology, Chinese University of Hong Kong Business School, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong)

Abstract

We study a robust selling problem where a seller attempts to sell one item to a buyer but is uncertain about the buyer’s valuation distribution. The existing literature shows that robust screening provides a stronger theoretical guarantee than robust deterministic pricing but at the expense of implementation complexity as it requires a menu of infinite options. Our research aims to find simple mechanisms to hedge against market ambiguity effectively. We develop a general framework for robust selling mechanisms with a finite menu (or randomization across finite prices). We propose a tractable reformulation that addresses various ambiguity sets of the buyer’s valuation distribution, including support, mean, and quantile ambiguity sets. We derive optimal selling mechanisms and corresponding performance ratios for different menu sizes, which show that even a modest menu size can deliver benefits similar to those achieved by the optimal robust mechanism with infinite options, establishing a favorable trade-off between theoretical performance and implementation simplicity. Remarkably, a menu size of merely two can significantly enhance the performance ratio compared with deterministic pricing.

Suggested Citation

  • Shixin Wang, 2025. "The Power of Simple Menus in Robust Selling Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 5268-5287, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:6:p:5268-5287
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.03738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03738
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:6:p:5268-5287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.