IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i6p5045-5082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Exposure to More Women in Male-Dominated Fields Render Female Students More Career-Oriented?

Author

Listed:
  • Bruna Borges

    (Sao Paulo School of Economics - FGV, Sao Paulo, SP 01313-020, Brazil)

  • Fernanda Estevan

    (Sao Paulo School of Economics - FGV, Sao Paulo, SP 01313-020, Brazil)

Abstract

The underrepresentation of women in traditionally male-dominated fields of study can generate a lack of role models for female students, influencing their career choices. We investigate whether having higher shares of female professors and classmates throughout undergraduate studies in economics affects female students’ labor market outcomes up to five years after graduation. To deal with self-selection into professors and peers, we exploit the assignment rule of students to course sections at the prestigious University of Sao Paulo and focus on mandatory courses. Our findings suggest that having more female peers and professors can positively impact female students’ labor outcomes by increasing their participation rates in the workforce and accumulated experience, particularly in course sections in which female students are underrepresented. We also investigate potential channels driving our results. We show that a higher share of female classmates can help female students stay attached to the job market early on by securing internships or formal work during university. Moreover, female students are more likely to choose higher paying and male-dominated occupations if they have access to more female peers. Overall, our study highlights the importance of gender diversity in male-dominated academic settings and its potential positive impact on female students’ career outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruna Borges & Fernanda Estevan, 2025. "Does Exposure to More Women in Male-Dominated Fields Render Female Students More Career-Oriented?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 5045-5082, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:6:p:5045-5082
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.01422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01422
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01422?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:6:p:5045-5082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.