IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i6p4669-4687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communication Quality and the Cost of Language: Evidence from Stack Overflow

Author

Listed:
  • Jacopo Bregolin

    (University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZH, United Kingdom)

Abstract

The transmission of information is crucial for productivity and growth. However, language differences may limit its effectiveness. This is particularly relevant for knowledge platforms that aim to be global, given the cultural diversity of the pool of users. In this paper, I empirically investigate how the exogenous cost of language affects communication quality and the trade-offs faced by knowledge platforms in implementing their website in multiple languages. I exploit the staggered introduction of websites for languages other than English on a question-and-answer platform to demonstrate two main facts. First, nonnative English speakers who contribute in English increase their answers’ quality once able to use their native language, and their answers are more likely to solve the questioner’s problem. The native-language answers drive the effect, which is larger when the question quality is higher and the incentives are stronger. Second, users who participate in their native language but not in English contribute lower-quality answers compared with those who contribute in English. This suggests that lower language barriers allow users with less expertise in the subject to participate. These results show that the platform should adopt multiple languages to maximise the quality of the information collected, although doing so may also result in an inflow of low-quality content from new users.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacopo Bregolin, 2025. "Communication Quality and the Cost of Language: Evidence from Stack Overflow," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 4669-4687, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:6:p:4669-4687
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.01333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01333
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:6:p:4669-4687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.