IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i6p4622-4642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kinks as Goals: Accelerating Commissions and the Performance of Sales Teams

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Kuhn

    (Department of Economics, University of California - Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106)

  • Lizi Yu

    (School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4067, Australia)

Abstract

Piecewise-linear reward schemes are very common in workplaces; by definition, they divide the set of possible performance levels into disjoint intervals that could have psychological value to workers. When these schemes take the form of lump-sum bonuses, any psychological rewards associated with attaining a performance interval are hard to distinguish from material ones because both material and psychological incentives predict bunching at the output needed to earn the bonus. To disentangle these effects, this paper studies a common but understudied class of piecewise-linear pay—accelerators—in which the mechanisms’ predictions conflict. Using the distributions of daily sales in 103 small retail teams, we find that daily sales bunch at accelerators, which is inconsistent with models in which only material rewards matter. Combining simple theoretical models, institutional evidence, and heterogeneity analyses, we argue that this unexpected bunching results from teams’ decisions to use the convenient, salient kink points as shared goals, which yield symbolic utility to their members when the points are attained.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Kuhn & Lizi Yu, 2025. "Kinks as Goals: Accelerating Commissions and the Performance of Sales Teams," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 4622-4642, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:6:p:4622-4642
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.01661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01661
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:6:p:4622-4642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.