IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i5p4413-4432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

LIBOR Discontinuation and the Cost of Bank Loans

Author

Listed:
  • Jeong-Bon Kim

    (Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1W6, Canada)

  • Chong Wang

    (School of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Business, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong SAR)

  • Feng (Harry) Wu

    (Department of Accountancy, Faculty of Business, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong SAR)

Abstract

With the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) being replaced by risk-free rate (RFR)-based alternative reference rates, the fundamental differences between the two benchmarking frameworks impose significant risks on banks. Exploiting the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)’s announcement of the phase-out of LIBOR, we conduct a difference-in-differences analysis based on banks’ reliance on LIBOR and show that LIBOR discontinuation entails higher interest rate spread of bank loans. The result implies that banks tend to compensate for the LIBOR-to-RFR risks by passing on the transition costs to borrowers. This effect is attenuated if multiple benchmarks are already in use, for relationship lending, and among banks operating in a competitive environment. We further find that LIBOR discontinuation leads to more collateral and covenant requirements in loan terms. After the FCA announcement, banks are inclined to switch away from LIBOR dependence by referencing alternative rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeong-Bon Kim & Chong Wang & Feng (Harry) Wu, 2025. "LIBOR Discontinuation and the Cost of Bank Loans," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(5), pages 4413-4432, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:5:p:4413-4432
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.03133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03133
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:5:p:4413-4432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.