IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i5p3641-3666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Artificial Intelligence Shape Audit Firms?

Author

Listed:
  • Kelvin K. F. Law

    (Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639956)

  • Michael Shen

    (NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245)

Abstract

Does artificial intelligence (AI) displace auditors? We exploit the staggered hiring of AI employees at audit office locations across the United States as a proxy for the use of AI at local audit offices. The main findings are as follows. First, relative to audit offices that do not yet hire AI employees, those that do hire AI employees have a 4.3% increase in the number of auditor jobs, particularly among junior and midlevel auditors. Second, using AI is associated with an increased demand for soft skills (e.g., cognitive skills) in auditor jobs. Third, audit offices that use AI have more accurate going concern and internal control opinions. Semistructured interviews of 11 seasoned audit partners confirm that investment in AI is centralized at the national level, but the decision to deploy it often resides at the local audit office level. Notably, none of the partners believe that AI has replaced or will replace human auditors. Overall, our study—comprising both empirical and qualitative data—suggests that using AI does not replace auditors, but rather changes the skills required for these jobs and improves audit quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelvin K. F. Law & Michael Shen, 2025. "How Does Artificial Intelligence Shape Audit Firms?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(5), pages 3641-3666, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:5:p:3641-3666
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.04040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.04040
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.04040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:5:p:3641-3666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.