IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i4p3428-3448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Silos: Increased Modularity and Decreased Stability in Intraorganizational Communication Networks During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Tiona Zuzul

    (Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02163)

  • Emily Cox Pahnke

    (Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Jonathan Larson

    (Microsoft Research, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington 98052)

  • Patrick Bourke

    (Microsoft Research, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington 98052)

  • Nicholas Caurvina

    (Microsoft Research, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington 98052)

  • Neha Parikh Shah

    (Microsoft Experiences, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington 98052)

  • Fereshteh Amini

    (Microsoft Experiences, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington 98052)

  • Jeffrey Weston

    (Microsoft Experiences, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington 98052)

  • Youngser Park

    (Center for Imaging Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218)

  • Joshua Vogelstein

    (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218)

  • Christopher White

    (Microsoft Research, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington 98052)

  • Carey E. Priebe

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218)

Abstract

Workplace communications around the world were drastically altered by the COVID-19 pandemic, related work-from-home orders, and the rise of remote work. To understand these shifts, we analyzed aggregated, anonymized metadata from over 360 billion emails within 4,361 organizations worldwide. By comparing month-to-month and year-over-year metrics, we examined changes in network community structures over the 24 months before and after COVID-19. We also examined shifts across multiple communication media (email, instant message, video call, and calendaring software) within a single global organization and compared them with communications shifts that were driven by changes in formal organizational structure. We found that in 2020, organizations around the world became more siloed than in 2019, evidenced by increased modularity. This shift was concurrent with decreased stability within silos. Collectively, our analyses indicate that following the onset of COVID-19, employees’ communications began to shift more dynamically between subcommunities (teams, workgroups, or functional areas). At the same time, once in a subcommunity, they limited their communication to other members of that community. We term these network changes dynamic silos . We provide initial insights into the meaning and implications of dynamic silos for the future of work.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiona Zuzul & Emily Cox Pahnke & Jonathan Larson & Patrick Bourke & Nicholas Caurvina & Neha Parikh Shah & Fereshteh Amini & Jeffrey Weston & Youngser Park & Joshua Vogelstein & Christopher White & Ca, 2025. "Dynamic Silos: Increased Modularity and Decreased Stability in Intraorganizational Communication Networks During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 3428-3448, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:4:p:3428-3448
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.02797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02797
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02797?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:4:p:3428-3448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.