IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i4p2778-2801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Secretary Problem with Independent Sampling

Author

Listed:
  • José Correa

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Chile)

  • Andrés Cristi

    (Center for Mathematical Modeling, Universidad de Chile, Chile)

  • Laurent Feuilloley

    (CNRS, INSA Lyon, UCBL, LIRIS, UMR5205, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France)

  • Tim Oosterwijk

    (School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands)

  • Alexandros Tsigonias-Dimitriadis

    (European Central Bank, 60314 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Abstract

The secretary problem is probably the most well-studied optimal stopping problem with many applications in economics and management. In the secretary problem, a decision maker faces an unknown sequence of values, revealed successively, and has to make irrevocable take-it-or-leave-it decisions. Her goal is to select the maximum value in the sequence. Although in the classic secretary problem the values of upcoming elements are entirely unknown, in many realistic situations, the decision maker has access to some information, for example, from past data. In this paper, we take a sampling approach and assume that before starting the sequence, each element is sampled independently with probability p . We study both the adversarial and the random arrival models. Our main result is to obtain the best possible algorithms for both settings and all values of p . As p grows to one, the obtained guarantees converge to the optimal guarantees in the full information case. Notably, we establish that the best possible algorithm in the adversarial order setting is a fixed threshold algorithm. In the random order setting, we characterize the best possible algorithm by a sequence of thresholds, dictating at which point in time we should accept a value. Surprisingly, this sequence is independent of p . We complement our theoretical results with numerical experiments on data of people playing the secretary problem repeatedly. Our results help explain some behavioral issues they raised and indicate that people play a strategy similar to our optimal algorithms from the start onwards, albeit slightly suboptimally.

Suggested Citation

  • José Correa & Andrés Cristi & Laurent Feuilloley & Tim Oosterwijk & Alexandros Tsigonias-Dimitriadis, 2025. "The Secretary Problem with Independent Sampling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 2778-2801, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:4:p:2778-2801
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.01580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.01580
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2021.01580?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:4:p:2778-2801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.