IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i3p2544-2564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selling Bonus Actions in Video Games

Author

Listed:
  • Lifei Sheng

    (Department of Decision Science, University of Houston–Clear Lake, Houston, Texas 77058)

  • Xuying Zhao

    (Department of Information and Operations Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843)

  • Christopher Thomas Ryan

    (Operations and Logistics Division, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z2, Canada)

Abstract

In the mobile video games industry, a common in-app purchase is for additional “moves” or “time” in single-player puzzle games. We call these in-app purchases bonus actions . In some games, bonus actions can only be purchased in advance of attempting a level of the game (pure advance sales (PAS)), yet in other games, bonus actions can only be purchased in a “spot” market that appears when an initial attempt to pass the level fails (pure spot sales). Some games offer both advance and spot purchases (hybrid advance sales). This paper studies these selling strategies for bonus actions in video games. Such a question is novel to in-app tools selling in video games, and it cannot be answered by previous advance selling studies focusing on end goods. We model the selling of bonus actions as a stochastic extensive form game. We show how the distribution of skill among players (i.e., their inherent ability to pass the level) and the inherent randomness of the game influence selling strategies. For casual games, where low-skill players have a sufficiently high probability of success in each attempt, if the proportion of high-skill players is either sufficiently large or sufficiently small, firms should adopt PAS and shut down the “spot” market. Furthermore, the player welfare-maximizing selling strategy is to sell only in the spot market. Hence, no “win-win” strategy exists for casual games. However, PAS can be a win-win for hardcore games, where low-skill players have a sufficiently low success probability for each attempt.

Suggested Citation

  • Lifei Sheng & Xuying Zhao & Christopher Thomas Ryan, 2025. "Selling Bonus Actions in Video Games," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(3), pages 2544-2564, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:3:p:2544-2564
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.02348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02348
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:3:p:2544-2564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.