IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i10p8390-8412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stressed Banks? Evidence from the Largest-Ever Supervisory Review

Author

Listed:
  • Puriya Abbassi

    (Deutsche Bundesbank, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Rajkamal Iyer

    (Imperial College Business School, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom)

  • José-Luis Peydró

    (Imperial College Business School, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom; and Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, 08005 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Paul E. Soto

    (Federal Reserve Board, Washington, District of Columbia 20006)

Abstract

We study short-term and medium-term changes in bank risk-taking as a result of supervision and the associated real effects. For identification, we exploit the European Central Bank’s asset-quality-review (AQR) in conjunction with security and credit registers. After the AQR announcement, reviewed banks reduce riskier securities and credit supply, with the greatest effect on riskiest securities. We find negative spillovers on asset prices and firm-level credit availability. Moreover, nonbanks with higher exposure to reviewed banks acquire the shed risk. After the AQR compliance, reviewed banks reload riskier securities but not riskier credit, resulting in negative medium-term firm-level real effects. These effects are especially strong for firms with high ex ante credit risk. Among these nonsafe firms, even those with high ex ante productivity, experience negative real effects. Our findings suggest that banks’ liquid assets help them to mask risk from supervisors and risk adjustments banks make in response to supervision have persistent corporate real effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Puriya Abbassi & Rajkamal Iyer & José-Luis Peydró & Paul E. Soto, 2025. "Stressed Banks? Evidence from the Largest-Ever Supervisory Review," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(10), pages 8390-8412, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:10:p:8390-8412
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.01714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.01714
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2020.01714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:10:p:8390-8412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.