IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v70y2024i6p4155-4165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Zero Cost” Majority Attacks on Permissionless Proof of Work Blockchains

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua S. Gans

    (Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6, Canada; National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138)

  • Hanna Halaburda

    (Department of Technology, Operations and Statistics, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012)

Abstract

The core premise of permissionless blockchains is their reliable and secure operation without the need to trust any individual agent. At the heart of blockchain consensus mechanisms is an explicit cost (e.g., mining cost) for participation in the network and the opportunity to add blocks to the blockchain. A key rationale for that cost is to make attacks on the network, which could be theoretically carried out if a majority of nodes were controlled by a single entity, too expensive to be worthwhile. We demonstrate that a majority attacker can successfully attack with a negative net cost when accounting for the mining rewards the attacker collects during the attack. This shows that the protocol mechanisms are insufficient to create a secure network, emphasizing the importance of socially driven mechanisms external to the protocol. At the same time, negative cost enables a new type of majority attack that is more likely to elude external scrutiny.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua S. Gans & Hanna Halaburda, 2024. "“Zero Cost” Majority Attacks on Permissionless Proof of Work Blockchains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 4155-4165, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:6:p:4155-4165
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.02426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02426
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:6:p:4155-4165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.